Suppr超能文献

对呼吸困难的喘息儿童进行临床评估时,观察者之间存在很大差异。

Large observer variation of clinical assessment of dyspnoeic wheezing children.

作者信息

Bekhof Jolita, Reimink Roelien, Bartels Ine-Marije, Eggink Hendriekje, Brand Paul L P

机构信息

Princess Amalia Children's Clinic, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.

Princess Amalia Children's Clinic, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jul;100(7):649-53. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307143. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In children with acute dyspnoea, the assessment of severity of dyspnoea and response to treatment is often performed by different professionals, implying that knowledge of the interobserver variation of this clinical assessment is important.

OBJECTIVE

To determine intraobserver and interobserver variation in clinical assessment of children with dyspnoea.

METHODS

From September 2009 to September 2010, we recorded a convenience sample of 27 acutely wheezing children (aged 3 months-7 years) in the emergency department of a general teaching hospital in the Netherlands, on video before and after treatment with inhaled bronchodilators. These video recordings were independently assessed by nine observers scoring wheeze, prolonged expiratory phase, retractions, nasal flaring and a general assessment of dyspnoea on a Likert scale (0-10). Assessment was repeated after 2 weeks to evaluate intraobserver variation.

RESULTS

We analysed 972 observations. Intraobserver reliability was the highest for supraclavicular retractions (κ 0.84) and moderate-to-substantial for other items (κ 0.49-0.65). Interobserver reliability was considerably worse, with κ<0.46 for all items. The smallest detectable change of the dyspnoea score (>3 points) was larger than the minimal important change (<1 point), meaning that in 69% of observations a clinically important change after treatment cannot be distinguished from measurement error.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraobserver variation is modest, and interobserver variation is large for most clinical findings in children with dyspnoea. The measurement error induced by this variation is too large to distinguish potentially clinically relevant changes in dyspnoea after treatment in two-thirds of observations. The poor interobserver reliability of clinical dyspnoea assessment in children limits its usefulness in clinical practice and research, and highlights the need to use more objective measurements in these patients.

摘要

背景

在急性呼吸困难的儿童中,呼吸困难严重程度的评估以及对治疗的反应通常由不同的专业人员进行,这意味着了解这种临床评估的观察者间差异很重要。

目的

确定呼吸困难儿童临床评估中的观察者内和观察者间差异。

方法

2009年9月至2010年9月,我们在荷兰一家综合教学医院的急诊科记录了27名急性喘息儿童(年龄3个月至7岁)在吸入支气管扩张剂治疗前后的视频,作为便利样本。这些视频记录由9名观察者独立评估,他们根据李克特量表(0 - 10)对喘息、呼气延长、凹陷、鼻翼扇动以及呼吸困难的总体评估进行评分。2周后重复评估以评估观察者内差异。

结果

我们分析了972次观察结果。观察者内信度在锁骨上凹陷方面最高(κ = 0.84),其他项目为中度至高度(κ = 0.49 - 0.65)。观察者间信度则差得多,所有项目的κ均<0.46。呼吸困难评分的最小可检测变化(>3分)大于最小重要变化(<1分),这意味着在69%的观察中,治疗后临床上重要的变化无法与测量误差区分开来。

结论

对于呼吸困难儿童的大多数临床发现,观察者内差异适中,而观察者间差异较大。这种差异导致的测量误差太大,以至于在三分之二的观察中无法区分治疗后呼吸困难潜在的临床相关变化。儿童临床呼吸困难评估的观察者间信度较差,限制了其在临床实践和研究中的实用性,并突出了对这些患者使用更客观测量方法的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验