Kuo Su Ching, Sun Jia Ling, Tang Siew Tzuh
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Nursing, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):3784-3799. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13720. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
To synthesise concepts of distinct depressive-symptom trajectories in published studies by establishing a measurable standard and estimate the prevalence of recategorised trajectories for bereaved families of chronically ill patients.
Grieving is a dynamic/individualised process. In studies treating depressive-symptom trajectories as heterogeneous, different criteria were used to identify distinct trajectories, resulting in inconsistent findings.
A systematic review of research guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria.
Five databases were systematically searched since each one's launch through June 2015. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the qualsyst evaluation tool. Distinct depressive-symptom trajectories were narratively synthesised based on depressive-symptom level, duration and improvement over time. The prevalence of recategorised depressive-symptom trajectories was recalculated from published data.
We identified six studies, published in 1994-2012, that followed 56-301 bereaved families from eight months to five years. We synthesised five new distinct trajectories (prevalence in synthesised sample): 'endurance' (54·2%), 'resilience' (8·8%), 'transient reaction' (7·7%), 'chronic grief' (19·4%) and 'chronic depression' (9·9%). The 'endurance' group experienced low depressive symptoms throughout the bereavement process. The 'resilience' group had severe depressive symptoms when they first transitioned into bereavement, but quickly recovered. The 'transient reaction' group's distress lasted 7-12 months postbereavement, gradually returning to prebereavement levels. After bereavement, the chronic grief and depression groups experienced prolonged periods of depressive symptoms, which improved gradually only in the 'chronic grief' group.
Most bereaved families endured their grief and adjusted, returning to prebereavement depressive-symptom levels within one year postloss (represented by our synthesised 'endurance', 'resilience' and 'transient reaction' groups), with only 9·9% suffering 'chronic depression'.
Guided by the synthesised distinct trajectories of depressive symptoms, clinicians should identify bereaved families' depressive-symptom trajectories and provide suitable interventions to facilitate adjustment of those with chronic depressive symptoms.
通过建立可衡量的标准,综合已发表研究中不同抑郁症状轨迹的概念,并估计慢性病患者丧亲家庭重新分类轨迹的患病率。
悲伤是一个动态的/个性化的过程。在将抑郁症状轨迹视为异质性的研究中,使用了不同的标准来识别不同的轨迹,导致结果不一致。
按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目标准进行系统评价研究。
自每个数据库启动至2015年6月,对五个数据库进行系统检索。两名评价者独立提取数据,并使用qualsyst评价工具评估研究质量。根据抑郁症状水平、持续时间和随时间的改善情况,对不同的抑郁症状轨迹进行叙述性综合。从已发表的数据中重新计算重新分类的抑郁症状轨迹的患病率。
我们确定了1994年至2012年发表的六项研究,这些研究跟踪了56至301个丧亲家庭,时间从八个月到五年不等。我们综合了五条新的不同轨迹(综合样本中的患病率):“忍耐型”(54.2%)、“恢复力型”(8.8%)、“短暂反应型”(7.7%)、“慢性悲伤型”(19.4%)和“慢性抑郁型”(9.9%)。“忍耐型”组在整个丧亲过程中经历的抑郁症状较轻。“恢复力型”组在刚进入丧亲状态时出现严重抑郁症状,但很快恢复。“短暂反应型”组的痛苦在丧亲后持续7至12个月,逐渐恢复到丧亲前的水平。丧亲后,“慢性悲伤型”和“慢性抑郁型”组经历了较长时间的抑郁症状,只有“慢性悲伤型”组的症状逐渐改善。
大多数丧亲家庭忍受了悲伤并进行了调整,在丧亲后一年内恢复到丧亲前的抑郁症状水平(以我们综合的“忍耐型”、“恢复力型”和“短暂反应型”组为代表),只有9.9%的家庭患有“慢性抑郁”。
在综合的抑郁症状不同轨迹的指导下,临床医生应识别丧亲家庭的抑郁症状轨迹,并提供适当的干预措施,以促进有慢性抑郁症状的家庭进行调整。