Suppr超能文献

阿伐斯汀与羟嗪及安慰剂治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹的比较

A comparison of acrivastine versus hydroxyzine and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.

作者信息

Salo O P, Harvey S G, Calthrop J G, Gibson J R

机构信息

HYKS/Allergiasairaala, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1989;17 Suppl 2:18B-21B.

PMID:2569996
Abstract

A total of 21 patients with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were assessed in a fully randomized, double-blind, crossover study to investigate the efficacy of 8 mg acrivastine versus 20 mg hydroxyzine and placebo administered three times daily. Both acrivastine and hydroxyzine were found to be effective, and significantly better than placebo, in controlling signs and symptoms of urticaria. No significant differences were found between the active preparations. Hydroxyzine was associated with significantly more reports of drowsiness than was placebo.

摘要

在一项完全随机、双盲、交叉研究中,对总共21例诊断为慢性特发性荨麻疹的患者进行了评估,以研究每日三次服用8毫克阿伐斯汀与20毫克羟嗪及安慰剂的疗效。结果发现,阿伐斯汀和羟嗪在控制荨麻疹的体征和症状方面均有效,且显著优于安慰剂。两种活性制剂之间未发现显著差异。与安慰剂相比,羟嗪导致嗜睡的报告明显更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验