Suppr超能文献

阿伐斯汀与氯苯那敏治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹的比较。

A comparison of acrivastine versus chlorpheniramine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.

作者信息

Gale A E, Harvey S G, Calthrop J G, Gibson J R

机构信息

Adelaide Aerobiology Laboratory, Hindmarsh, South Australia.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1989;17 Suppl 2:25B-27B.

PMID:2569998
Abstract

A total of 20 patients with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were entered into a fully randomized, double-blind, crossover study to investigate the efficacy of 8 mg acrivastine versus 4 mg chlorpheniramine three times daily. Data from 16 patients were available for analysis. Both acrivastine and chlorpheniramine were found to be effective in relieving the signs and symptoms of urticaria. There were no significant differences between the two treatments, although efficacy trends were generally in favour of acrivastine over chlorpheniramine throughout the study.

摘要

共有20名被诊断为慢性特发性荨麻疹的患者进入一项完全随机、双盲、交叉研究,以调查每日三次服用8毫克阿伐斯汀与4毫克氯苯那敏的疗效。16名患者的数据可供分析。结果发现,阿伐斯汀和氯苯那敏在缓解荨麻疹的体征和症状方面均有效。两种治疗方法之间没有显著差异,尽管在整个研究中,疗效趋势总体上倾向于阿伐斯汀优于氯苯那敏。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验