Suppr超能文献

阿伐斯汀与氯苯那敏治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹的比较。

A comparison of acrivastine versus chlorpheniramine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.

作者信息

Gale A E, Harvey S G, Calthrop J G, Gibson J R

机构信息

Adelaide Aerobiology Laboratory, Hindmarsh, South Australia.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1989;17 Suppl 2:25B-27B.

PMID:2569998
Abstract

A total of 20 patients with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were entered into a fully randomized, double-blind, crossover study to investigate the efficacy of 8 mg acrivastine versus 4 mg chlorpheniramine three times daily. Data from 16 patients were available for analysis. Both acrivastine and chlorpheniramine were found to be effective in relieving the signs and symptoms of urticaria. There were no significant differences between the two treatments, although efficacy trends were generally in favour of acrivastine over chlorpheniramine throughout the study.

摘要

共有20名被诊断为慢性特发性荨麻疹的患者进入一项完全随机、双盲、交叉研究,以调查每日三次服用8毫克阿伐斯汀与4毫克氯苯那敏的疗效。16名患者的数据可供分析。结果发现,阿伐斯汀和氯苯那敏在缓解荨麻疹的体征和症状方面均有效。两种治疗方法之间没有显著差异,尽管在整个研究中,疗效趋势总体上倾向于阿伐斯汀优于氯苯那敏。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验