Kondo Naoki, Saito Masashige, Hikichi Hiroyuki, Aida Jun, Ojima Toshiyuki, Kondo Katsunori, Kawachi Ichiro
School of Public Health, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nihon Fukushi University, Nagoya, Japan.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jul;69(7):680-5. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205103. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
Relative deprivation of income is hypothesised to generate frustration and stress through upward social comparison with one's peers. If psychosocial stress is the mechanism, relative deprivation should be more strongly associated with specific health outcomes, such as cardiovascular disease (compared with other health outcomes, eg, non-tobacco-related cancer).
We evaluated the association between relative income deprivation and mortality by leading causes, using a cohort of 21 031 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older. A baseline mail-in survey was conducted in 2003. Information on cause-specific mortality was obtained from death certificates. Our relative deprivation measure was the Yitzhaki Index, derived from the aggregate income shortfall for each person, relative to individuals with higher incomes in that person's reference group. Reference groups were defined according to gender, age group and same municipality of residence.
We identified 1682 deaths during the 4.5 years of follow-up. A Cox regression demonstrated that, after controlling for demographic, health and socioeconomic factors including income, the HR for death from cardiovascular diseases per SD increase in relative deprivation was 1.50 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.08) in men, whereas HRs for mortality by cancer and other diseases were close to the null value. Additional adjustment for depressive symptoms and health behaviours (eg, smoking and preventive care utilisation) attenuated the excess risks for mortality from cardiovascular disease by 9%. Relative deprivation was not associated with mortality for women.
The results partially support our hypothesised mechanism: relative deprivation increases health risks via psychosocial stress among men.
收入相对剥夺被认为会通过与同龄人进行向上的社会比较而产生挫折感和压力。如果心理社会压力是其机制,那么相对剥夺应该与特定的健康结果,如心血管疾病(与其他健康结果相比,如非烟草相关癌症)有更强的关联。
我们使用一个由21031名65岁及以上社区居住成年人组成的队列,评估了相对收入剥夺与主要死因死亡率之间的关联。2003年进行了一项基线邮寄调查。从死亡证明中获取特定病因死亡率的信息。我们的相对剥夺衡量指标是伊茨哈基指数,它是根据每个人相对于其参考组中收入较高者的总收入缺口得出的。参考组根据性别、年龄组和居住在同一城市来定义。
在4.5年的随访期间,我们确定了1682例死亡。Cox回归表明,在控制了包括收入在内的人口统计学、健康和社会经济因素后,男性相对剥夺每增加1个标准差,心血管疾病死亡的风险比(HR)为1.50(95%置信区间1.09至2.08),而癌症和其他疾病死亡的HR接近零值。对抑郁症状和健康行为(如吸烟和预防性医疗服务利用)进行额外调整后,心血管疾病死亡的额外风险降低了9%。相对剥夺与女性死亡率无关。
结果部分支持了我们假设的机制:相对剥夺通过男性的心理社会压力增加健康风险。