IJzerman Hans, Regenberg Nina F E, Saddlemyer Justin, Koole Sander L
VU University, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands; Utrecht University, Campusplein 1, Utrecht 3584 ED, The Netherlands.
VU University, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 May;157:23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
Linguistic category priming is a novel paradigm to examine automatic influences of language on cognition (Semin, 2008). An initial article reported that priming abstract linguistic categories (adjectives) led to more global perceptual processing, whereas priming concrete linguistic categories (verbs) led to more local perceptual processing (Stapel & Semin, 2007). However, this report was compromised by data fabrication by the first author, so that it remains unclear whether or not linguistic category priming influences perceptual processing. To fill this gap in the literature, the present article reports 12 studies among Dutch and US samples examining the perceptual effects of linguistic category priming. The results yielded no evidence of linguistic category priming effects. These findings are discussed in relation to other research showing cultural variations in linguistic category priming effects (IJzerman, Saddlemyer, & Koole, 2014). The authors conclude by highlighting the importance of conducting and publishing replication research for achieving scientific progress.
语言类别启动是一种用于检验语言对认知的自动影响的新范式(塞米恩,2008年)。最初的一篇文章报道,启动抽象语言类别(形容词)会导致更全局的知觉加工,而启动具体语言类别(动词)会导致更局部的知觉加工(斯塔佩尔和塞米恩,2007年)。然而,该报告因第一作者的数据造假而受到影响,因此语言类别启动是否影响知觉加工仍不清楚。为了填补文献中的这一空白,本文报告了在荷兰和美国样本中进行的12项研究,检验语言类别启动的知觉效应。结果没有产生语言类别启动效应的证据。这些发现与其他显示语言类别启动效应存在文化差异的研究(伊泽曼、萨德尔迈尔和库勒,2014年)相关进行了讨论。作者通过强调开展和发表重复研究对实现科学进步的重要性来得出结论。