• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食物购物模式及其与饮食模式的关联:潜在类别分析。

Food shopping profiles and their association with dietary patterns: a latent class analysis.

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Jul;115(7):1109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.12.013. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jand.2014.12.013
PMID:25704262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4484312/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Food shopping is a complex behavior that consists of multiple dimensions. Little research has explored multiple dimensions of food shopping or examined how it relates to dietary intake.

OBJECTIVE

To identify patterns (or classes) of food shopping across four domains (fresh food purchasing, conscientious food shopping, food shopping locations, and food/beverage purchasing on or near campus) and explore how these patterns relate to dietary intake among college students.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional online survey was administered.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Students attending a public 4-year university and a 2-year community college in the Twin Cities (Minnesota) metropolitan area (N=1,201) participated in this study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fast-food and soda consumption as well as meeting fruit and vegetable, fiber, added sugar, calcium, dairy, and fat recommendations.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Crude and adjusted latent class models and adjusted logistic regression models were fit.

RESULTS

An eight-class solution was identified: "traditional shopper" (14.9%), "fresh food and supermarket shopper" (14.1%), "convenience shopper" (18.8%), "conscientious convenience shopper" (13.8%), "conscientious, fresh food, convenience shopper" (11.8%), "conscientious fresh food shopper" (6.6%), "conscientious nonshopper" (10.2%), and "nonshopper" (9.8%). "Fresh food and supermarket shoppers" and "conscientious fresh food shoppers" had better dietary intake (for fast food, calcium, dairy, and added sugar), whereas "convenience shoppers" and "conscientious convenience shoppers," and "nonshoppers" had worse dietary intake (for soda, calcium, dairy, fiber, and fat) than "traditional shoppers."

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight unique patterns in food shopping and associated dietary patterns that could inform tailoring of nutrition interventions for college students. Additional research is needed to understand modifiable contextual influences of healthy food shopping.

摘要

背景

食品购物是一种复杂的行为,由多个维度组成。很少有研究探索食品购物的多个维度,也很少研究它与饮食摄入的关系。

目的

确定四个领域(新鲜食品购买、认真购物、购物地点以及校园内或附近的食品/饮料购买)的食品购物模式(或类别),并探讨这些模式与大学生饮食摄入的关系。

设计

进行了一项横断面在线调查。

参与者/设置:明尼苏达州双子城(明尼阿波利斯-圣保罗都会区)地区公立 4 年制大学和 2 年制社区学院的学生参加了这项研究(N=1201)。

主要观察指标

快餐和苏打水的消费以及满足水果和蔬菜、纤维、添加糖、钙、乳制品和脂肪推荐量的情况。

统计分析

拟合了粗分类和调整后的潜在类别模型以及调整后的逻辑回归模型。

结果

确定了一个 8 类解决方案:“传统购物者”(14.9%)、“新鲜食品和超市购物者”(14.1%)、“便利购物者”(18.8%)、“认真便利购物者”(13.8%)、“认真、新鲜食品、便利购物者”(11.8%)、“认真购买新鲜食品者”(6.6%)、“认真不购物者”(10.2%)和“不购物者”(9.8%)。“新鲜食品和超市购物者”和“认真购买新鲜食品者”的饮食摄入更好(快餐、钙、乳制品和添加糖),而“便利购物者”和“认真便利购物者”以及“不购物者”的饮食摄入更差(苏打水、钙、乳制品、纤维和脂肪)与“传统购物者”相比。

结论

这些发现突出了食品购物和相关饮食模式的独特模式,可以为针对大学生的营养干预措施提供信息。需要进一步研究以了解健康食品购物的可改变的环境影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3b/4484312/8d738d391be4/nihms666267f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3b/4484312/8d738d391be4/nihms666267f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d3b/4484312/8d738d391be4/nihms666267f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Food shopping profiles and their association with dietary patterns: a latent class analysis.食物购物模式及其与饮食模式的关联:潜在类别分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Jul;115(7):1109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.12.013. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
2
Campus food and beverage purchases are associated with indicators of diet quality in college students living off campus.校园食品和饮料购买与校外居住的大学生饮食质量指标有关。
Am J Health Promot. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(2):80-7. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120705-QUAN-326. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
3
How we eat what we eat: identifying meal routines and practices most strongly associated with healthy and unhealthy dietary factors among young adults.我们如何选择饮食:确定与年轻人健康和不健康饮食因素最密切相关的用餐习惯和行为。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2135-45. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002717. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
4
Sociodemographic differences in selected eating practices among alternative high school students.替代高中学生在特定饮食行为方面的社会人口统计学差异。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 May;109(5):823-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.02.001.
5
Small Convenience Stores and the Local Food Environment: An Analysis of Resident Shopping Behavior Using Multilevel Modeling.小型便利店与当地食品环境:基于多层次模型的居民购物行为分析
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(3):172-80. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140326-QUAN-121. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
Food Insecurity and Dietary Intake among College Students with Unlimited Meal Plans at a Large, Midwestern University.中西部一所大型大学中,拥有不限量餐饮计划的大学生的食物不安全和饮食摄入情况。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Nov;121(11):2267-2274. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 May 8.
7
Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling of Students' Dietary Intentions/Behaviors, BMI, and the Healthfulness of Convenience Stores.多水平结构方程模型分析学生饮食意向/行为、BMI 指数与便利店商品健康度的关系。
Nutrients. 2018 Oct 23;10(11):1569. doi: 10.3390/nu10111569.
8
Food Acquisition and Shopping Patterns among Residents of Low-Income and Low-Access Communities in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州低收入、低服务社区居民的食物获取和购物模式。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Oct;118(10):1844-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
9
Using the Australian Dietary Guidelines 2&5 education message in supermarket shopping trolleys to nudge shoppers to purchase more fruit and vegetables: A feasibility study using an intervention design.利用澳大利亚饮食指南 2&5 的教育信息在超市购物车中引导购物者购买更多的水果和蔬菜:使用干预设计的可行性研究。
Nutr Bull. 2024 Jun;49(2):189-198. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12674. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
10
Perceived stress and dietary choices: The moderating role of stress management.压力感知与饮食选择:压力管理的调节作用。
Eat Behav. 2016 Aug;22:211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Nutrition Knowledge Varies by Food Group and Nutrient Among Adults.成年人对营养知识的掌握因食物种类和营养素而异。
Foods. 2025 Feb 12;14(4):606. doi: 10.3390/foods14040606.
2
Identifying food behavior profiles among adult US cancer survivors: a latent class analysis.识别美国成年癌症幸存者的饮食行为模式:一项潜在类别分析。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Dec 12. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01722-z.
3
Human exposome assessment platform.人类暴露组评估平台。
Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 3;5(6):e182. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000182. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Patterns of beverage purchases amongst British households: A latent class analysis.英国家庭饮料购买模式:潜在类别分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 8;17(9):e1003245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003245. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Factors Influencing Purchase Intention for Low-Sodium and Low-Sugar Products.影响低钠低糖产品购买意愿的因素
Foods. 2020 Mar 18;9(3):351. doi: 10.3390/foods9030351.
6
Delay discounting and household food purchasing decisions: The SHoPPER study.延迟折扣与家庭食物购买决策:SHoPPER 研究。
Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;38(4):334-342. doi: 10.1037/hea0000727.
7
Food Acquisition and Shopping Patterns among Residents of Low-Income and Low-Access Communities in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州低收入、低服务社区居民的食物获取和购物模式。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Oct;118(10):1844-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
8
Internists' Perceptions of Proton Pump Inhibitor Adverse Effects and Impact on Prescribing Practices: Results of a Nationwide Survey.内科医生对质子泵抑制剂不良反应的认知及其对处方行为的影响:一项全国性调查结果
Gastroenterology Res. 2018 Feb;11(1):11-17. doi: 10.14740/gr944w. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
9
Video-Based Grocery Shopping Intervention Effect on Purchasing Behaviors Among Latina Shoppers.基于视频的杂货店购物干预对拉丁裔购物者购买行为的影响
Am J Public Health. 2017 May;107(5):800-806. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303725. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
10
Meal Timing and Frequency: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.进餐时间与频率:对心血管疾病预防的影响:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2017 Feb 28;135(9):e96-e121. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000476. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Eliminating Bias in Classify-Analyze Approaches for Latent Class Analysis.消除潜在类别分析中分类-分析方法的偏差。
Struct Equ Modeling. 2015 Jan;22(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.935265.
2
An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (part 1): overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses.潜在变量混合建模简介(第1部分):概述与横断面潜在类别分析和潜在剖面分析
J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Mar;39(2):174-87. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst084. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
3
Campus food and beverage purchases are associated with indicators of diet quality in college students living off campus.校园食品和饮料购买与校外居住的大学生饮食质量指标有关。
Am J Health Promot. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(2):80-7. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120705-QUAN-326. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
4
Emerging adulthood: a critical age for preventing excess weight gain?成年初期:预防体重过度增加的关键时期?
Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2012 Dec;23(3):571-88.
5
Positive attitudes toward organic, local, and sustainable foods are associated with higher dietary quality among young adults.年轻人对有机、本地和可持续食品的积极态度与更高的饮食质量有关。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Jan;113(1):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.08.021.
6
Nutrition label use partially mediates the relationship between attitude toward healthy eating and overall dietary quality among college students.营养标签的使用部分中介了大学生对健康饮食的态度与整体饮食质量之间的关系。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Mar;112(3):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.047.
7
Socioeconomic disparities in emerging adult weight and weight behaviors.新兴成年人的体重及体重相关行为中的社会经济差异。
Am J Health Behav. 2012 Jul;36(4):433-45. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.36.4.1.
8
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 2011.美国农业部和美国卫生与公众服务部,《2010年美国人膳食指南》。第7版,华盛顿特区:美国政府印刷局,2011年1月。
Adv Nutr. 2011 May;2(3):293-4. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000430. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
9
Situational characteristics of young adults' eating occasions: a real-time data collection using Personal Digital Assistants.年轻人进食场合的情境特征:使用个人数字助理进行实时数据收集。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Mar;14(3):472-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010003186. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
10
Household income differences in food sources and food items purchased.家庭收入差异对食品来源和购买食品的影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Oct 26;7:77. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-77.