Bradford Elisabeth E F, Jentzsch Ines, Gomez Juan-Carlos
School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland KY16 9JP, UK.
Cognition. 2015 May;138:21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
'Theory of Mind' refers to the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and other people (Premack & Woodruff, 1978). This study examined the extent to which 'Self' and 'Other' belief-attribution processes within the Theory of Mind (ToM) mechanism could be distinguished behaviourally, and whether these separable components differentially related to Executive Functioning (EF) abilities. A computerized false-belief task, utilizing a matched-design to allow direct comparison of self-oriented vs. other-oriented belief-attribution, was used to assess ToM, and a face-image Stroop task was employed to assess EF, within a population of typically-developed adults. Results revealed significantly longer reaction times when attributing beliefs to other people as opposed to recognizing and attributing beliefs to oneself. Intriguingly, results revealed that 'perspective-shift' requirements (i.e. changing from adoption of the 'self' perspective to the perspective of the 'other', or vice versa) across false-belief trials influenced reaction times. Reaction times were significantly longer when the perspective shift was from self-to-other than from other-to-self. It is suggested that the 'self' forms the stem of understanding the 'other', and is therefore processed regardless of ultimate task demands; in contrast, the 'other' perspective is only processed when explicitly required. We conclude that adopting another person's perspective, even when their belief state is matched to one's own, requires more cognitive effort than recalling and reflecting on self-oriented belief-states.
“心理理论”是指将心理状态归因于自己和他人的能力(普雷马克和伍德拉夫,1978)。本研究考察了心理理论(ToM)机制中的“自我”和“他人”信念归因过程在行为上能够被区分的程度,以及这些可分离的成分与执行功能(EF)能力是否存在差异相关。在一群发育正常的成年人中,使用了一个计算机化的错误信念任务,该任务采用匹配设计以直接比较自我导向与他人导向的信念归因,用于评估心理理论,并采用面部图像斯特鲁普任务来评估执行功能。结果显示,与识别和将信念归因于自己相比,将信念归因于他人时的反应时间明显更长。有趣的是,结果显示在错误信念试验中,“视角转换”要求(即从采用“自我”视角转换到“他人”视角,反之亦然)会影响反应时间。当视角从自我转换到他人时,反应时间明显长于从他人转换到自我时。研究表明,“自我”构成了理解“他人”的基础,因此无论最终的任务要求如何都会被处理;相比之下,“他人”视角只有在明确需要时才会被处理。我们得出结论,即使他人的信念状态与自己的相匹配,采用他人的视角也比回忆和思考自我导向的信念状态需要更多的认知努力。