Holler Judith, Kendrick Kobin H
Language and Cognition Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 9;6:98. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00098. eCollection 2015.
One of the most intriguing aspects of human communication is its turn-taking system. It requires the ability to process on-going turns at talk while planning the next, and to launch this next turn without considerable overlap or delay. Recent research has investigated the eye movements of observers of dialogs to gain insight into how we process turns at talk. More specifically, this research has focused on the extent to which we are able to anticipate the end of current and the beginning of next turns. At the same time, there has been a call for shifting experimental paradigms exploring social-cognitive processes away from passive observation toward on-line processing. Here, we present research that responds to this call by situating state-of-the-art technology for tracking interlocutors' eye movements within spontaneous, face-to-face conversation. Each conversation involved three native speakers of English. The analysis focused on question-response sequences involving just two of those participants, thus rendering the third momentarily unaddressed. Temporal analyses of the unaddressed participants' gaze shifts from current to next speaker revealed that unaddressed participants are able to anticipate next turns, and moreover, that they often shift their gaze toward the next speaker before the current turn ends. However, an analysis of the complex structure of turns at talk revealed that the planning of these gaze shifts virtually coincides with the points at which the turns first become recognizable as possibly complete. We argue that the timing of these eye movements is governed by an organizational principle whereby unaddressed participants shift their gaze at a point that appears interactionally most optimal: It provides unaddressed participants with access to much of the visual, bodily behavior that accompanies both the current speaker's and the next speaker's turn, and it allows them to display recipiency with regard to both speakers' turns.
人类交流中最引人入胜的一个方面是其轮流发言系统。它要求具备在规划下一轮发言的同时处理正在进行的发言轮次的能力,并能在没有大量重叠或延迟的情况下开启下一轮发言。最近的研究调查了对话观察者的眼球运动,以深入了解我们如何处理发言轮次。更具体地说,这项研究聚焦于我们能够在多大程度上预测当前轮次的结束和下一轮次的开始。与此同时,有人呼吁将探索社会认知过程的实验范式从被动观察转向在线处理。在此,我们展示了一项研究,该研究通过将用于追踪对话者眼球运动的先进技术置于自然的面对面交流中来回应这一呼吁。每次对话都有三名以英语为母语的人参与。分析聚焦于仅涉及其中两名参与者的问答序列,从而使第三名参与者暂时未被涉及。对未被涉及的参与者从当前发言者到下一位发言者的目光转移进行的时间分析表明,未被涉及的参与者能够预测下一轮次,而且,他们经常在当前轮次结束前就将目光转向下一位发言者。然而,对发言轮次复杂结构的分析表明,这些目光转移的规划实际上与轮次首次可被识别为可能结束的时间点相吻合。我们认为,这些眼球运动的时间安排受一种组织原则支配,即未被涉及的参与者在一个互动上看起来最优化的点转移目光:这为未被涉及的参与者提供了获取伴随当前发言者和下一位发言者轮次的大部分视觉、身体行为的机会,并且使他们能够对两位发言者的轮次表现出接受态度。