Patel Preeti, Cummings Rachael, Roberts Bayard
Global Health and Security, Department of War Studies, King's College London, London, UK.
Save the Children UK, London, UK.
Confl Health. 2015 Feb 2;9:7. doi: 10.1186/s13031-015-0031-z. eCollection 2015.
BACKGROUND: Global Health Initiatives (GHIs) respond to high-impact communicable diseases in resource-poor countries, including health systems support, and are major actors in global health. GHIs could play an important role in countries affected by armed conflict given these countries commonly have weak health systems and a high burden of communicable disease. The aim of this study is to explore the influence of two leading GHIs, the Global Fund and the GAVI Alliance, on the health systems of conflict-affected countries. METHODS: This study used an analytical review approach to identify evidence on the role of the Global Fund and the GAVI Alliance with regards to health systems support to 19 conflict-affected countries. Primary and secondary published and grey literature were used, including country evaluations from the Global Fund and the GAVI Alliance. The WHO heath systems building blocks framework was used for the analysis. RESULTS: There is a limited evidence-base on the influence of GHIs on health systems of conflict-affected countries. The findings suggest that GHIs are increasingly investing in conflict-affected countries which has helped to rapidly scale up health services, strengthen human resources, improve procurement, and develop guidelines and protocols. Negative influences include distorting priorities within the health system, inequitable financing of disease-specific services over other health services, diverting staff away from more essential health care services, inadequate attention to capacity building, burdensome reporting requirements, and limited flexibility and responsiveness to the contextual challenges of conflict-affected countries. CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence of increasing engagement of the Global Fund and the GAVI Alliance with health systems in conflict-affected countries, but this engagement should be supported by more context-specific policies and approaches.
背景:全球卫生倡议(GHIs)致力于应对资源匮乏国家中具有高影响力的传染病,包括提供卫生系统支持,是全球卫生领域的主要参与者。鉴于受武装冲突影响的国家通常卫生系统薄弱且传染病负担沉重,全球卫生倡议在这些国家可能发挥重要作用。本研究的目的是探讨两个主要的全球卫生倡议,即全球基金和疫苗免疫全球联盟(GAVI Alliance),对受冲突影响国家卫生系统的影响。 方法:本研究采用分析性综述方法,以确定关于全球基金和疫苗免疫全球联盟在向19个受冲突影响国家提供卫生系统支持方面作用的证据。使用了已发表的一手和二手文献以及灰色文献,包括全球基金和疫苗免疫全球联盟的国家评估报告。分析采用了世界卫生组织卫生系统构建模块框架。 结果:关于全球卫生倡议对受冲突影响国家卫生系统影响的证据基础有限。研究结果表明,全球卫生倡议在受冲突影响国家的投资日益增加,这有助于迅速扩大卫生服务规模、加强人力资源、改善采购,并制定指南和规程。负面影响包括扭曲卫生系统内的优先事项、对特定疾病服务的融资比对其他卫生服务不公平、使工作人员从更基本的卫生保健服务岗位流失、对能力建设关注不足、报告要求繁重,以及对受冲突影响国家的具体情况挑战缺乏灵活性和应对能力。 结论:有证据表明全球基金和疫苗免疫全球联盟在受冲突影响国家与卫生系统的互动日益增加,但这种互动应得到更具针对性的政策和方法的支持。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016-7-18
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019-4-1
Health Policy Plan. 2012-2-13
Glob Public Health. 2016
2017-11-3
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021-8-9
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020-8-27
Ann Glob Health. 2019-5-13
Bull World Health Organ. 2017-2-1
Glob Public Health. 2014
Confl Health. 2014-5-12
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014-1
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2012-7-9
Health Policy Plan. 2012-3-8
Health Policy Plan. 2012-2-13
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2012-2-9