1 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA ; 2 Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China ; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120752, Korea ; 4 Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen 52074, Germany ; 5 Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2015 Feb;4(1):34-47. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.01.01.
Since the discovery of fibrocytes in 1994 by Dr. Bucala and colleagues, these bone marrow (BM)-derived collagen Type I producing CD45(+) cells remain the most fascinating cells of the hematopoietic system. Despite recent reports on the emerging contribution of fibrocytes to fibrosis of parenchymal and non-parenchymal organs and tissues, fibrocytes remain the most understudied pro-fibrogenic cellular population. In the past years fibrocytes were implicated in the pathogenesis of liver, skin, lung, and kidney fibrosis by giving rise to collagen type I producing cells/myofibroblasts. Hence, the role of fibrocytes in fibrosis is not well defined since different studies often contain controversial results on the number of fibrocytes recruited to the site of injury versus the number of fibrocyte-derived myofibroblasts in the same fibrotic organ. Furthermore, many studies were based on the in vitro characterization of fibrocytes formed after outgrowth of BM and/or peripheral blood cultures. Therefore, the fibrocyte function(s) still remain(s) lack of understanding, mostly due to (I) the lack of mouse models that can provide complimentary in vivo real-time and cell fate mapping studies of the dynamic differentiation of fibrocytes and their progeny into collagen type I producing cells (and/or possibly, other cell types of the hematopoietic system); (II) the complexity of hematopoietic cell differentiation pathways in response to various stimuli; (III) the high plasticity of hematopoietic cells. Here we summarize the current understanding of the role of CD45(+) collagen type I(+) BM-derived cells in the pathogenesis of liver injury. Based on data obtained from various organs undergoing fibrogenesis or other type of chronic injury, here we also discuss the most recent evidence supporting the critical role of fibrocytes in the mediation of pro-fibrogenic and/or pro-inflammatory responses.
自 1994 年 Bucala 博士及其同事发现纤维细胞以来,这些骨髓(BM)来源的胶原蛋白 I 产生 CD45(+)细胞仍然是造血系统中最令人着迷的细胞。尽管最近有报道称纤维细胞对实质和非实质器官和组织纤维化的新兴贡献,但纤维细胞仍然是研究最少的促纤维化细胞群体。在过去的几年中,纤维细胞通过产生胶原蛋白 I 产生细胞/肌成纤维细胞而被认为与肝、皮肤、肺和肾纤维化的发病机制有关。因此,纤维细胞在纤维化中的作用尚未得到很好的定义,因为不同的研究经常在损伤部位募集的纤维细胞数量与同一纤维化器官中纤维细胞衍生的肌成纤维细胞数量之间存在争议结果。此外,许多研究基于 BM 和/或外周血培养物外生后形成的纤维细胞的体外特征描述。因此,纤维细胞的功能仍然缺乏了解,主要是由于(I)缺乏能够提供补充的体内实时和细胞命运图谱研究纤维细胞及其祖细胞向胶原蛋白 I 产生细胞(和/或可能是造血系统的其他细胞类型)的动态分化的小鼠模型;(II)对各种刺激的造血细胞分化途径的复杂性;(III)造血细胞的高可塑性。在这里,我们总结了目前对 CD45(+)胶原蛋白 I(+) BM 来源细胞在肝损伤发病机制中的作用的认识。基于从经历纤维化或其他类型慢性损伤的各种器官获得的数据,我们还讨论了最近支持纤维细胞在介导促纤维化和/或促炎反应中的关键作用的证据。