Suppr超能文献

需要大量输血的严重出血的输血干预措施:一项系统评价

Transfusion interventions in critical bleeding requiring massive transfusion: a systematic review.

作者信息

McQuilten Zoe K, Crighton Gemma, Engelbrecht Sunelle, Gotmaker Robert, Brunskill Susan J, Murphy Michael F, Wood Erica M

机构信息

Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Transfusion Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Transfusion Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Transfus Med Rev. 2015 Apr;29(2):127-37. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

Abstract

Critical bleeding (CB) requiring massive transfusion (MT) can occur in a variety of clinical contexts and is associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. In 2011, the Australian National Blood Authority (NBA) published patient blood management guidelines for CB and MT, which found limited high-quality evidence from which only 2 recommendations could be made. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to update these guidelines and identify evidence gaps still to be addressed. A comprehensive search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and SRs using MeSH index and free text terms in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2012), EMBASE, CINHAL, PUBMED, and the Transfusion Evidence Library up to July 15, 2014. The evidence was grouped according to 4 questions based on the original guideline relating to transfusion interventions: (1) effect of dose, timing, and ratio of red blood cells (RBCs) to component therapy on patient outcomes; (2) effect of RBC transfusion on patient outcomes; (3) effect of fresh frozen plasma, platelet, cryoprecipitate, fibrinogen concentrate, and prothrombin complex concentrate on patient outcomes; and (4) effect of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) on patient outcomes. From this search, 19 studies were identified: 6 RCTs and 13 SRs. Two of the RCTs were pilot/feasibility studies, 3 were investigating rFVIIa, and 1 compared restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Overall, limited new evidence was identified and substantial evidence gaps remain, particularly with regard to the effect of component therapies, including ratio of RBC to component therapies, on patient outcomes. Clinical trials to address these questions are required.

摘要

需要大量输血(MT)的严重出血(CB)可能发生在多种临床情况下,并伴有较高的死亡率和发病率。2011年,澳大利亚国家血液管理局(NBA)发布了针对CB和MT的患者血液管理指南,发现高质量证据有限,仅能提出2条建议。本系统评价(SR)的目的是更新这些指南,并确定仍需解决的证据空白。使用医学主题词表(MeSH)索引和自由文本词,在MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆(2012年第11期)、EMBASE、CINHAL、PUBMED以及截至2014年7月15日的输血证据库中,对随机对照试验(RCT)和SR进行了全面检索。根据与输血干预相关的原始指南中的4个问题对证据进行分组:(1)红细胞(RBC)剂量、输注时机以及RBC与成分治疗的比例对患者预后的影响;(2)RBC输血对患者预后的影响;(3)新鲜冰冻血浆、血小板、冷沉淀、纤维蛋白原浓缩物和凝血酶原复合物浓缩物对患者预后的影响;(4)重组活化因子VII(rFVIIa)对患者预后的影响。通过此次检索,共识别出19项研究:6项RCT和13项SR。其中2项RCT为试点/可行性研究,3项研究rFVIIa,1项比较了上消化道出血中限制性与宽松性RBC输血。总体而言,新发现的证据有限,证据空白仍然很大,特别是在成分治疗的影响方面,包括RBC与成分治疗的比例对患者预后的影响。需要开展临床试验来解决这些问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验