Suppr超能文献

表观遗传学与抑郁症:当前进展及未来方向综述

Epigenetics and depressive disorders: a review of current progress and future directions.

作者信息

Januar Vania, Saffery Richard, Ryan Joanne

机构信息

Cancer & Disease Epigenetics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, & Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia and

Cancer & Disease Epigenetics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, & Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia and.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1364-87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu273. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several broad lines of evidence support the involvement of epigenetic processes in neurodevelopment and psychiatric disorders. Epigenetic disruption also provides a potential mechanism to account for the numerous gene-environment interactions that have been reported in association with neuropsychiatric phenotypes.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed with keywords 'depression', 'depressive disorder' or 'antidepressants' and 'DNA methylation', or 'epigenetics' in humans. Citations were limited to those written in English and published prior to July 2014.

RESULTS

We present a summary of results to date. Most studies have focused on DNA methylation in various CNS or peripheral tissue, with almost universally small sample sizes. Although seven epigenome-wide association studies have now been reported, the majority of studies have used a candidate-gene approach. Three genes (SLC6A4, BDNF, NR3C1) have been investigated in more than one study, but replication of findings is generally lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent evidence provides insights to epigenetic processes in psychiatric disorders; however, replication is lacking and care must be taken in the interpretation of current findings. This applies to epigenetic epidemiology generally, which is subject to various limitations that no single approach can address in isolation. Due to limited focus of most depression studies to date, placing the findings within the broader context of mood disorder pathophysiology may prove challenging. However, identifying peripheral biomarkers for depressive disorder remains a tantalising possibility, especially given the potential for carefully-designed longitudinal studies with multiple biospecimens and ongoing advances in epigenetic technologies.

摘要

背景

多条广泛的证据支持表观遗传过程参与神经发育和精神疾病。表观遗传破坏也为解释与神经精神表型相关的众多基因-环境相互作用提供了一种潜在机制。

方法

对文献进行综述,关键词为人类中的“抑郁症”“抑郁障碍”或“抗抑郁药”以及“DNA甲基化”或“表观遗传学”。引用文献限于2014年7月之前发表的英文文献。

结果

我们总结了迄今为止的研究结果。大多数研究集中于各种中枢神经系统或外周组织中的DNA甲基化,样本量几乎普遍较小。尽管目前已报道了7项全表观基因组关联研究,但大多数研究采用的是候选基因方法。超过一项研究对三个基因(SLC6A4、BDNF、NR3C1)进行了调查,但研究结果普遍缺乏重复性。

结论

近期证据为精神疾病中的表观遗传过程提供了见解;然而,研究结果缺乏重复性,在解释当前发现时必须谨慎。这普遍适用于表观遗传流行病学,它受到各种限制,没有单一方法能够单独解决。由于迄今为止大多数抑郁症研究的重点有限,将研究结果置于情绪障碍病理生理学的更广泛背景中可能具有挑战性。然而,确定抑郁症的外周生物标志物仍然是一个诱人的可能性,特别是考虑到精心设计的多生物样本纵向研究的潜力以及表观遗传技术的不断进步。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验