Hernandez-Halton Isabel
Am J Psychoanal. 2015 Mar;75(1):76-85. doi: 10.1057/ajp.2014.56.
The aim of this article is to revisit Ferenczi's Clinical Diary (1932) to investigate the influence he had on Melanie Klein's work. It starts from the position that insufficient recognition has been given to Ferenczi's contribution to Klein's body of work and her professional development. Her analysis with Ferenczi lasted 5 years, a relatively long analysis for the period. It explores his influence in three specific areas: the importance of raw and early emotion in the maternal bond, the importance of freedom and authenticity in the analytic relationship, and finally the use of transference and countertransference feelings. Ferenczi's ill-fated experiment with mutual analysis will be discussed as it opened up a route to explore the analytic relationship, with important consequences for the future development of psychoanalysis.
本文旨在重温费伦齐的《临床日记》（1932年），以探究他对梅兰妮·克莱因的工作所产生的影响。本文开篇即指出，费伦齐对克莱因的著作及她的职业发展所做的贡献未得到充分认可。她与费伦齐的分析持续了5年，在当时算是一段较长时间的分析。本文探讨了他在三个特定领域的影响：原始及早期情感在母婴关系中的重要性、分析关系中自由与真实性的重要性，以及最后移情和反移情情感的运用。费伦齐命运多舛的相互分析实验也将被讨论，因为它开辟了一条探索分析关系的途径，对精神分析的未来发展产生了重要影响。
