Kaur Daljit, Sharma Ratti Ram, Marwaha Neelam
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015 Jan-Jun;9(1):31-5. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.150945.
Different methods of platelet concentrate preparations leave behind certain number of residual leukocytes, accounting for most of the febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions, especially in multitransfused patients. Various inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-6 are generated during storage and have been implicated for these adverse effects. We have studied the levels of these cytokines and their correlation with leucocyte contents in platelet concentrates prepared by three different methods.
Five pools of platelet rich plasma platelet concentrates (PRP-PC) and buffy-coat platelet concentrates (BC-PC) each were prepared and divided into two halves. One half of the pool was leucofiltered (LF), whereas the other half was stored as such. Ten apheresis units were also included in the study. All the platelet concentrates were assessed for leucocyte load and cytokine content (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) on different days of storage (0, 3, and 5) using Nageotte chamber and commercially available immunoassays respectively.
There was a statistically significant rise in cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) in nonleucofiltered (NLF) random donor platelet concentrates (RDPs) (PRP-PC and BC-PC) during storage (day 3 and 5) whereas LF RDP concentrates (PRP-PC and BC-PC) and apheresis platelet concentrates (AP-PC) did not show any significant rise in cytokine levels (on day 3 and 5) over the baseline values at day 0.
This data suggests that although AP-PCs are superior to PRP-PC (NLF) and BC-PC (NLF) in terms of in vitro quality control parameters and cytokine generation during storage, BC-PC mode of platelet preparation followed by leucofiltration is the best method to store platelets and minimise the cytokine accumulation. This strategy is best suited for transfusion in multitransfused hematooncologic patients, who cannot afford single donor apheresis platelets.
不同的血小板浓缩物制备方法会残留一定数量的白细胞,这是大多数发热性非溶血性输血反应的主要原因,尤其是在多次输血的患者中。在储存过程中会产生各种炎性细胞因子,如肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)和IL-6,这些细胞因子与这些不良反应有关。我们研究了通过三种不同方法制备的血小板浓缩物中这些细胞因子的水平及其与白细胞含量的相关性。
制备了五组富血小板血浆血小板浓缩物(PRP-PC)和白膜层血小板浓缩物(BC-PC),每组均分为两半。其中一半进行白细胞过滤(LF),另一半则原样储存。研究还纳入了10个单采血小板单位。分别使用纳盖奥特计数板和市售免疫测定法,在储存的不同天数(0、3和5天)对所有血小板浓缩物的白细胞负荷和细胞因子含量(IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-α)进行评估。
在储存期间(第3天和第5天),未进行白细胞过滤(NLF)的随机供者血小板浓缩物(RDPs)(PRP-PC和BC-PC)中的细胞因子水平(IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-α)有统计学意义的升高,而白细胞过滤的RDP浓缩物(PRP-PC和BC-PC)和单采血小板浓缩物(AP-PC)在第3天和第5天的细胞因子水平相较于第0天的基线值没有显著升高。
该数据表明,尽管在体外质量控制参数和储存期间细胞因子生成方面,AP-PC优于PRP-PC(NLF)和BC-PC(NLF),但采用白细胞过滤的BC-PC血小板制备方式是储存血小板并使细胞因子积累最小化的最佳方法。这种策略最适合无法负担单采血小板的多次输血血液肿瘤患者输血。