Mason B S, Lemstra M, van der Woude L H V, Vegter R, Goosey-Tolfrey V L
Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leics, LE11 3TU, UK.
Centre for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Med Eng Phys. 2015 Apr;37(4):392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
The aim of the current investigation was to explore the lateral stiffness of different sports wheelchair wheels available to athletes in 'new' and 'used' conditions and to determine the effect of (a) stiffness, (b) tyre type (clincher vs. tubular) and (c) tyre orientation on the physiological and biomechanical responses to submaximal and maximal effort propulsion specific to wheelchair basketball. Eight able-bodied individuals participated in the laboratory-based testing, which took place on a wheelchair ergometer at two fixed speeds (1.1 and 2.2 m s(-1)). Outcome measures were power output and physiological demand (oxygen uptake and heart rate). Three participants with experience of over-ground sports wheelchair propulsion also performed 2 × 20 m sprints in each wheel configuration. Results revealed that wheels differed significantly in lateral stiffness with the 'new' Spinergy wheel shown to be the stiffest (678.2 ± 102.1 N mm(-1)). However the effects of stiffness on physiological demand were minimal compared to tyre type whereby tubular tyres significantly reduced the rolling resistance and power output in relation to clincher tyres. Therefore tyre type (and subsequently inflation pressure) remains the most important aspect of wheel specification for athletes to consider and monitor when configuring a sports wheelchair.
本次调查的目的是探究运动员可使用的不同运动轮椅车轮在“新”和“旧”状态下的横向刚度,并确定(a)刚度、(b)轮胎类型(夹胎与管胎)和(c)轮胎方向对轮椅篮球特定的次最大努力和最大努力推进时的生理和生物力学反应的影响。八名身体健全的个体参与了基于实验室的测试,测试在轮椅测力计上以两种固定速度(1.1和2.2米/秒)进行。结果指标是功率输出和生理需求(摄氧量和心率)。三名有地面运动轮椅推进经验的参与者也在每种车轮配置下进行了2×20米短跑。结果显示,车轮的横向刚度有显著差异,“新的”斯皮内尔吉(Spinergy)车轮刚度最大(678.2±102.1牛·毫米-1)。然而,与轮胎类型相比,刚度对生理需求的影响最小,管胎相对于夹胎显著降低了滚动阻力和功率输出。因此,对于运动员在配置运动轮椅时考虑和监测的车轮规格而言,轮胎类型(以及随后的充气压力)仍然是最重要的方面。