Ettwig Janne F, Bronkhorst Adelbert W
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; TNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 2;10(3):e0118216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118216. eCollection 2015.
In four experiments, we studied the time course of interference between detection of an oddball orientation target (OT) in an 8-item circular search display, and identification of a letter target (LT) in a central stream of distractor letters. Dual-task performance for different temporal lags between targets was compared to single-task performance. When the LT preceded the OT, dual-task performance levels were reduced at short inter-target intervals of 0 and 166 ms; when the OT preceded the LT, the dual-task interference was unexpectedly stronger and lasted for up to 500 ms. Resource competition due to temporally overlapping target processing cannot account for this result, because the feature search task is easier than the letter identification task, and therefore would have generated less interference when presented first. Two alternative explanations were explored. First, by manipulating the spatial inter-target distance, we investigated to what degree there is a penalty associated with directing the attentional window from a large object (the search display) to a smaller object (the central letter stream). Second, by varying the duration of the OT and subsequent mask, we studied whether the interference was caused by the difficulty of disengaging attention from the search display. Results support this second explanation and thus indicate that switching attention to the letter stream is hampered by the continuing presence of (masked) search display items. This result shows that attentional effects may play a major role in dual-task execution and can easily obscure interference due to other factors such as resource competition.
在四项实验中,我们研究了在一个包含8个项目的圆形搜索显示中检测异常方向目标(OT)与在分心字母的中央流中识别字母目标(LT)之间干扰的时间进程。将不同目标间时间滞后下的双任务表现与单任务表现进行了比较。当LT先于OT出现时,在0和166毫秒的短目标间间隔下双任务表现水平降低;当OT先于LT出现时,双任务干扰出乎意料地更强,且持续长达500毫秒。由于目标处理在时间上重叠导致的资源竞争无法解释这一结果,因为特征搜索任务比字母识别任务更容易,因此当首先呈现时会产生较少的干扰。我们探讨了两种替代解释。首先,通过操纵目标间的空间距离,我们研究了将注意力窗口从大物体(搜索显示)转移到小物体(中央字母流)会在多大程度上受到惩罚。其次,通过改变OT及其后续掩蔽的持续时间,我们研究了干扰是否由难以将注意力从搜索显示上脱离引起。结果支持了第二种解释,因此表明对字母流的注意力切换受到(掩蔽的)搜索显示项目持续存在的阻碍。这一结果表明,注意力效应可能在双任务执行中起主要作用,并且很容易掩盖由于其他因素(如资源竞争)导致的干扰。