• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在乳腺癌治疗决策中,我们如何才能最大程度地尊重患者的自主权?

How can we best respect patient autonomy in breast cancer treatment decisions?

作者信息

Martinez Kathryn A, Kurian Allison W, Hawley Sarah T, Jagsi Reshma

机构信息

VA Center for Clinical Management Research, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 3rd Floor, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.

Stanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Dr, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Manag. 2015;4(1):53-64. doi: 10.2217/bmt.14.47.

DOI:10.2217/bmt.14.47
PMID:25733982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4342843/
Abstract

Helping patients to maximize their autonomy in breast cancer decision-making is an important aspect of patient-centered care. Shared decision-making is a strategy that aims to maximize patient autonomy by integrating the values and preferences of the patient with the biomedical expertise of the physician. Application of this approach in breast cancer decision-making has not been uniform across cancer-specific interventions (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy), and in some circumstances may present challenges to evidence-based care delivery. Increasingly precise estimates of individual patients' risk of recurrence and commensurate predicted benefit from certain therapies hold significant promise in helping patients exercise autonomous decision-making for their breast cancer care, yet will also likely complicate decision-making for certain subgroups of patients.

摘要

帮助患者在乳腺癌决策中最大限度地实现自主是以人为本的医疗护理的一个重要方面。共同决策是一种策略,旨在通过将患者的价值观和偏好与医生的生物医学专业知识相结合,最大限度地提高患者的自主权。这种方法在乳腺癌决策中的应用在不同的癌症特异性干预措施(如手术、化疗)中并不统一,在某些情况下可能会给循证医疗带来挑战。对个体患者复发风险的日益精确估计以及某些治疗相应的预期获益,在帮助患者对其乳腺癌护理做出自主决策方面具有重大前景,但也可能使某些亚组患者的决策变得复杂。

相似文献

1
How can we best respect patient autonomy in breast cancer treatment decisions?在乳腺癌治疗决策中,我们如何才能最大程度地尊重患者的自主权?
Breast Cancer Manag. 2015;4(1):53-64. doi: 10.2217/bmt.14.47.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
Patient autonomy in dentistry: demonstrating the role for shared decision making.牙科中的患者自主权:展示共同决策的作用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01317-5.
4
5
Patient preferences for locoregional therapy in early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者对局部区域治疗的偏好。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Sep;183(2):291-309. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05737-9. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
6
A study protocol of the effectiveness of PEGASUS: a multi-centred study comparing an intervention to promote shared decision making about breast reconstruction with treatment as usual.PEGASUS有效性的研究方案:一项多中心研究,比较一种促进乳房重建共同决策的干预措施与常规治疗。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0543-0.
7
Rethinking autonomy: decision making between patient and surgeon in advanced illnesses.重新思考自主权:晚期疾病中患者与外科医生之间的决策。
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Feb;4(4):77. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2016.01.36.
8
Developing a Web-Based Shared Decision-Making Tool for Fertility Preservation Among Reproductive-Age Women With Breast Cancer: An Action Research Approach.开发基于网络的乳腺癌育龄期女性生育力保存决策支持工具:行动研究方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 17;23(3):e24926. doi: 10.2196/24926.
9
Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions.乳腺癌的治疗决策:患者偏好与医生认知
Cancer. 2002 Apr 1;94(7):2076-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10393.
10
Young breast cancer patients' involvement in treatment decisions: the major role played by decision-making about surgery.年轻乳腺癌患者参与治疗决策:手术决策发挥主要作用。
Psychooncology. 2013 Nov;22(11):2546-56. doi: 10.1002/pon.3316. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Breast Cancer: Considerations for the Breast Surgical Oncologist.乳腺癌中的补充与替代医学:乳腺外科肿瘤学家的考量
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17850-4.
2
Dissecting autonomy in a resource-constrained setting: a descriptive qualitative study of women's decisions on the surgical treatment of early breast cancer in northern Sri Lanka.剖析资源受限环境下的自主权:对斯里兰卡北部女性关于早期乳腺癌手术治疗决策的描述性定性研究
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2494396. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2494396. Epub 2025 May 14.
3
Biographical Renewal and its Facilitators in Cancer Survivorship: A Conceptual Paper.癌症幸存者的传记更新及其促进因素:一篇概念性论文。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2024 Jan-Mar;30(1):16-20. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_332_2023. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
4
Information transparency with immediate release: Oncology clinician and patient perceptions.即时信息透明化:肿瘤临床医生和患者的看法。
Am J Surg. 2024 Jan;227:165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.015. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
5
Analyzing the Quality and Readability of Online Hyaluronic Acid Knee Injection Resources.分析在线透明质酸膝关节注射资源的质量和可读性。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 9;15(8):e43225. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43225. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Cross-sectional nationwide mixed-methods population-based study of living conditions, and identification of sexual and fertility profiles among young women after breast cancer in France: the Candy study protocol.法国一项基于人群的全国性横断面混合方法研究:癌症生存者生活质量研究(Candy 研究)方案,旨在探讨乳腺癌患者年轻女性的生存状况和生育及性生活状况。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 28;12(9):e056834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056834.
7
An evaluation of readability and understandability of online education materials for breast cancer survivors.评估乳腺癌幸存者在线教育材料的可读性和可理解性。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Apr;18(2):457-465. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01240-w. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
8
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic breast cancer in elderly patients.老年寡转移性乳腺癌的立体定向消融放疗
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Jan;9(Suppl 1):S197-S206. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.08.29.
9
Travel, Treatment Choice, and Survival Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Analysis.乳腺癌患者的旅行、治疗选择与生存情况:一项基于人群的分析。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2021 Jan 11;2(1):1-10. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0094. eCollection 2021.
10
How patients experience endocrine therapy for breast cancer: an online survey of side effects, adherence, and medical team support.患者对乳腺癌内分泌治疗的体验:一项关于副作用、依从性和医疗团队支持的在线调查。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Feb;15(1):29-39. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00908-5. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer after publication of randomized trials.随机试验发表后,乳腺癌采用分割放射治疗。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1001-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.032.
2
Use of and mortality after bilateral mastectomy compared with other surgical treatments for breast cancer in California, 1998-2011.1998 年至 2011 年加利福尼亚州乳腺癌患者行双侧乳房切除术与其他手术治疗方法的应用及死亡率比较。
JAMA. 2014 Sep 3;312(9):902-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10707.
3
Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2.携带有 PALB2 基因突变的家族中的乳腺癌风险。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 7;371(6):497-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400382.
4
Endocrine therapy for breast cancer: assessing an array of women's treatment experiences and perceptions, their perceived self-efficacy and nonadherence.乳腺癌内分泌治疗:评估一系列女性的治疗经历与认知、她们感知到的自我效能及不依从情况。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Dec;14(6):460-467.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline focused update.激素受体阳性乳腺癌女性的辅助内分泌治疗:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南重点更新
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 20;32(21):2255-69. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.2258. Epub 2014 May 27.
6
Social and Clinical Determinants of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.对侧预防性乳房切除术的社会和临床决定因素
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jun;149(6):582-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5689.
7
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: An Opportunity for Shared Decision Making.对侧预防性乳房切除术:共同决策的契机。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jun;149(6):589-90. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5713.
8
Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment.临床评估多基因测序 panel 用于遗传性癌症风险评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 1;32(19):2001-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6607. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
9
Congruence between patients' preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature.患者对参与医疗决策的偏好与感知的一致性:文献综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Apr 3;14:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-25.
10
Older women's experience with breast cancer treatment decisions.老年女性在乳腺癌治疗决策方面的经历。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 May;145(1):211-23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2921-y. Epub 2014 Mar 31.