Berthelsen Mona, Pallesen Ståle, Bjorvatn Bjørn, Knardahl Stein
Department of Work Psychology and Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Norway.
Ind Health. 2015;53(3):280-92. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2014-0186. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
The purpose of the present study was to answer the following research questions: (1) Do workers in different shift schedules differ in mental distress? (2) Do workers in different shift schedules differ in neuroticism? (3) Do shift schedules differ in psychosocial work exposures? (4) Do psychosocial work exposures contribute to mental distress among onshore- and offshore workers? (5) Does neuroticism confound the association between work exposures and mental distress? Workers on six shift-schedules answered a questionnaire (1,471 of 2,628 employees). Psychological and social work factors were measured by QPSNordic, mental distress was measured by HADS and neuroticism was measured by EPQ. The results showed 1) No differences in mental distress between workers in different shift schedules, 2) Revolving-shift workers reported higher neuroticism compared to day workers, 3) Swing-shift workers and revolving-shift workers reported lower job control compared to permanent-night and -day workers, 4) Job demands and role conflict were associated with more mental distress. Job control, role clarity, support, and leadership were associated with lower mental distress, 5) Neuroticism influenced the relationship between psychosocial work factors and mental distress. The present study did not find differences in mental distress between shift schedules. Job characteristics may be contributing factors when determining health effects of shift work.
(1)不同轮班安排的工人在精神痛苦方面是否存在差异?(2)不同轮班安排的工人在神经质方面是否存在差异?(3)不同轮班安排在心理社会工作暴露方面是否存在差异?(4)心理社会工作暴露是否会导致陆上和海上工人出现精神痛苦?(5)神经质是否会混淆工作暴露与精神痛苦之间的关联?采用六种轮班安排的工人回答了一份问卷(2628名员工中的1471名)。心理和社会工作因素通过北欧问卷(QPSNordic)进行测量,精神痛苦通过医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)进行测量,神经质通过艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)进行测量。结果显示:1)不同轮班安排的工人在精神痛苦方面没有差异;2)与日班工人相比,倒班工人报告的神经质水平更高;3)与长期夜班和日班工人相比,中班工人和倒班工人报告的工作控制水平较低;4)工作需求和角色冲突与更多的精神痛苦相关。工作控制、角色清晰度、支持和领导力与较低的精神痛苦相关;5)神经质影响心理社会工作因素与精神痛苦之间的关系。本研究未发现不同轮班安排在精神痛苦方面存在差异。在确定轮班工作对健康的影响时,工作特征可能是促成因素。