• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轮班工人与其他工人之间职业危害暴露的重要差异;比较 1980 年前后的工作场所。

Important Difference between Occupational Hazard Exposure among Shift Workers and Other Workers; Comparing Workplace before and after 1980.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Functional Pharmacology, Uppsala University, 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.

Unit of Medical Epidemiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;17(20):7495. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207495.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17207495
PMID:33076288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7602472/
Abstract

Improving health and safety at work has been an important issue for the European Union since the 1980s. The existing literature supports that shift work is associated with multiple indicators of poor health but frequently neglects the potential impact of occupational hazards. This study aims at describing and comparing the exposure to different workplace hazards among shift and other workers before and after 1980. Exposure to different workplace hazards (noise, dust, pollutant, and other physical stressors) were analyzed among 119,413 participants from the UK Biobank cohort. After stratifying the analyses before and after 1980, exposure was compared between shift and other workers. Potential confounding variables (sex, age, ethnicity, education level, occupational category, and neuroticism) were adjusted for in the log-binomial regression. Shift workers had a higher prevalence ratio (PR) than other workers of being exposed to almost all identified hazards both before or after 1980. They were also more likely to be exposed to multiple hazards compared to other workers, both before 1980 (PR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.21-1.30) and after 1980 (PR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.30-1.38). The prevalence of all measured risk factors was higher after 1980 than before 1980 among shift workers. Of note, the work environment has improved overall for other workers. Our findings suggest that changes at the workplace have benefited other workers more than shift workers as they are still more exposed to all occupational hazards.

摘要

改善工作场所的健康和安全一直是欧盟自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的一个重要问题。现有文献支持轮班工作与多种健康不良指标有关,但经常忽略职业危害的潜在影响。本研究旨在描述和比较 1980 年前和 1980 年后轮班和其他工人在不同工作场所面临的危害。在英国生物库队列中,对 119413 名参与者进行了不同工作场所危害(噪声、粉尘、污染物和其他物理应激源)的暴露分析。在分层分析 1980 年前和 1980 年后,比较了轮班和其他工人之间的暴露情况。在对数二项式回归中调整了潜在混杂变量(性别、年龄、种族、教育水平、职业类别和神经质)。轮班工人比其他工人更有可能接触到几乎所有在 1980 年前或 1980 年后确定的危害,而且他们也比其他工人更有可能接触到多种危害,1980 年前(PR:1.25;95%CI:1.21-1.30)和 1980 年后(PR:1.34;95%CI:1.30-1.38)。在轮班工人中,1980 年后所有测量的风险因素的患病率均高于 1980 年前。值得注意的是,与轮班工人相比,其他工人的工作环境总体上有所改善。我们的研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,工作场所的变化使其他工人受益更多,而轮班工人仍面临更多的职业危害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/7602472/97b2be3522fa/ijerph-17-07495-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/7602472/47eff3486444/ijerph-17-07495-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/7602472/71ade39387a4/ijerph-17-07495-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/7602472/5a2dabc78ace/ijerph-17-07495-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/7602472/97b2be3522fa/ijerph-17-07495-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/7602472/47eff3486444/ijerph-17-07495-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/7602472/71ade39387a4/ijerph-17-07495-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/7602472/5a2dabc78ace/ijerph-17-07495-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44c/7602472/97b2be3522fa/ijerph-17-07495-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Important Difference between Occupational Hazard Exposure among Shift Workers and Other Workers; Comparing Workplace before and after 1980.轮班工人与其他工人之间职业危害暴露的重要差异;比较 1980 年前后的工作场所。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;17(20):7495. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207495.
2
Does exposure to workplace hazards cluster by occupational or sociodemographic characteristics? An analysis of foreign-born workers in Australia.工作场所危害因素是否会根据职业或社会人口特征聚集?对澳大利亚外籍工人的分析。
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Sep;63(9):803-816. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23146. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
3
Correlation between occupational hazard exposure and abnormal bone mineral density in steelworkers.钢铁工人职业危害暴露与骨密度异常之间的相关性
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):1431. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22713-4.
4
[Survey of occupational health condition in a shipyard in Guangzhou, China].[中国广州某造船厂职业健康状况调查]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;33(4):268-70.
5
New Zealanders working non-standard hours also have greater exposure to other workplace hazards.工作时间不标准的新西兰人也更容易接触到其他工作场所的危害。
Chronobiol Int. 2017;34(4):519-526. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1307850.
6
Do working environment interventions reach shift workers?工作环境干预措施对轮班工人有效吗?
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Jan;89(1):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1060-z. Epub 2015 May 23.
7
[Fatigue symptoms and workplace related factors of long-term care workers employed in facilities].[长期护理机构中工作人员的疲劳症状及与工作场所相关的因素]
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2015;57(3):77-84. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.B14015. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
8
A Novel Use of Latent Class Analysis to Identify Patterns of Workplace Hazards among Informally Employed Domestic Workers in 14 Cities, United States, 2011-2012.一种新的潜在类别分析方法在识别美国 14 个城市非正规就业家庭佣工工作场所危害模式中的应用,2011-2012 年。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Aug 7;66(7):838-862. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac028.
9
Occupational hazards in opinions of forestry employees in Poland.波兰林业员工眼中的职业危害。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019 Jun 17;26(2):242-248. doi: 10.26444/aaem/106246. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
NTP Toxicity Study Report on the atmospheric characterization, particle size, chemical composition, and workplace exposure assessment of cellulose insulation (CELLULOSEINS).美国国家毒理学计划关于纤维素绝缘材料(CELLULOSEINS)的大气特征、粒径、化学成分及工作场所暴露评估的毒性研究报告
Toxic Rep Ser. 2006 Aug(74):1-62, A1-C2.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between shift/night work and irregular periods and period pain among two cohorts of Australian women 16 years apart: findings from the Australian longitudinal study on women's health.相隔16年的两组澳大利亚女性中轮班/夜班工作与月经不调和经期疼痛之间的关联:澳大利亚女性健康纵向研究的结果
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2025 Aug;98(6):537-547. doi: 10.1007/s00420-025-02152-9. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
Precarious work and its impact on health: a study of female textile workers in Lahore and Faisalabad.不稳定工作及其对健康的影响:拉合尔和费萨拉巴德女性纺织工人的研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 14;13:1529594. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1529594. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Nurses and Night Shifts: Poor Sleep Quality Exacerbates Psychomotor Performance.护士与夜班:睡眠质量差会加剧精神运动表现。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Oct 14;14:579938. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.579938. eCollection 2020.
2
Personality, lifestyle and job satisfaction: causal association between neuroticism and job satisfaction using Mendelian randomisation in the UK biobank cohort.个性、生活方式和工作满意度:使用英国生物库队列的孟德尔随机化研究神经质与工作满意度之间的因果关系。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0691-3.
3
Cardiovascular Health Effects of Shift Work with Long Working Hours and Night Shifts: Study Protocol for a Three-Year Prospective Follow-Up Study on Industrial Workers.
Supporting the working life exposome: Annotating occupational exposure for enhanced literature search.
支持工作生活外显子组:对职业暴露进行注释以增强文献检索。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 15;19(8):e0307844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307844. eCollection 2024.
4
Factors influencing menstrual regularity among female workers: a cross-sectional analysis study.影响女性工人月经规律的因素:一项横断面分析研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 May 20;24(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03142-8.
5
Shift work and menstruation: A meta-analysis study.轮班工作与月经:一项荟萃分析研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Oct 21;24:101542. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101542. eCollection 2023 Dec.
心血管健康影响的轮班工作与长时间工作和夜班:一项为期三年的前瞻性随访研究工业工人的研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 16;17(2):589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020589.
4
Exposure to asbestos and the risk of colorectal cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接触石棉与结直肠癌死亡率的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Occup Environ Med. 2019 Nov;76(11):861-871. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105735. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
5
Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe.工作场所的健康促进:欧洲政策与实践的比较
Saf Health Work. 2019 Mar;10(1):21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
6
Working Time Society consensus statements: Circadian time structure impacts vulnerability to xenobiotics-relevance to industrial toxicology and nonstandard work schedules.工作时间协会共识声明:昼夜节律时间结构影响对外源化学物的易感性——与工业毒理学和非标准工作时间表的相关性。
Ind Health. 2019 Apr 1;57(2):158-174. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.SW-2. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Multiple Exposures and Coexposures to Occupational Hazards Among Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.农业工人对职业危害的多重暴露和共同暴露:观察性研究的系统评价
Saf Health Work. 2018 Sep;9(3):239-248. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data.英国生物银行资源库,具有深度表型和基因组数据。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):203-209. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
Historical evolution of regulatory standards for occupational and consumer exposures to industrial talc.工业滑石粉职业和消费者暴露监管标准的历史演变。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;92:251-267. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
10
Meta-analysis on shift work and risks of specific obesity types.关于轮班工作与特定肥胖类型风险的荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2018 Jan;19(1):28-40. doi: 10.1111/obr.12621. Epub 2017 Oct 4.