Suppr超能文献

Seeplex PneumoBacter aCE检测法与内部多重PCR用于肺炎链球菌鉴定的比较

Comparison of Seeplex PneumoBacter aCE detection assay and in-house multiplex PCR for the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

作者信息

Luznik Dane, Kosnik Mitja, Tomic Viktorija

机构信息

Laboratory for Respiratory Microbiology, University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia.

出版信息

New Microbiol. 2015 Jan;38(1):51-8. Epub 2015 Jan 1.

Abstract

Rapid and accurate identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae is important for appropriate and prudent antimicrobial use in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection. It is difficult to separate S. pneumoniae from commensal viridans group streptococci either by classical techniques or molecular methods. Aim of this study was to compare a commercially available multiplex PCR assay Seeplex PneumoBacter ACE Detection assay (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea), and in-house multiplex PCR using primer sets for lytA and cpsA for ability to differentiate S. pneumoniae in a known set of bacteria (S. pneumoniae and viridans group streptococci) and clinical samples. Of 20 viridans streptococcal isolates, 8 were misidentified as S. pneumoniae by commercial PCR test. Of 209 throat swabs tested with Seeplex PneumoBacter ACE Detection assay, 122 (58,4%) were positive for S. pneumoniae while only 11 (5.3%) samples were positive with lytA and cpsA primers. Therefore, the commercial multiplex PCR test appears to have low specificity in diagnosing S. pneumoniae.

摘要

快速准确地鉴定肺炎链球菌对于下呼吸道感染的适当和谨慎使用抗菌药物非常重要。无论是通过经典技术还是分子方法,都很难将肺炎链球菌与共生草绿色链球菌区分开来。本研究的目的是比较市售的多重PCR检测Seeplex PneumoBacter ACE检测试剂盒(韩国首尔Seegene公司)和使用lytA和cpsA引物对的内部多重PCR,以区分已知细菌组(肺炎链球菌和草绿色链球菌)和临床样本中的肺炎链球菌。在20株草绿色链球菌分离株中,有8株被商业PCR检测误鉴定为肺炎链球菌。在用Seeplex PneumoBacter ACE检测试剂盒检测的209份咽拭子中,122份(58.4%)肺炎链球菌呈阳性,而使用lytA和cpsA引物时只有11份(5.3%)样本呈阳性。因此,商业多重PCR检测在诊断肺炎链球菌时似乎特异性较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验