Clark Melissa A, Gorelick Jeremy J, Sicks JoRean D, Park Elyse R, Graham Amanda L, Abrams David B, Gareen Ilana F
Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI; Center for Population Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, RI;
Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI;
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jan;18(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv037. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
Lung screening is an opportunity for smoking cessation and relapse prevention, but smoking behaviors may differ across screening results. Changes in smoking were evaluated among 18 840 current and former smokers aged 55-74 scheduled to receive three annual lung screenings.
Participants were randomized to low-dose computed tomography or single-view chest radiography in the American College of Radiology/National Lung Screening Trial. Outcome measures included point and sustained (6-month) abstinence and motivation to quit among smokers; and relapse among smokers who quit during follow-up, recent quitters (quit < 6 months), and long-term former smokers (quit ≥ 6 months).
During five years of follow-up, annual point prevalence quit rates ranged from 11.6%-13.4%; 48% of current smokers reported a quit attempt and 7% of long-term former smokers relapsed. Any false positive screening result was associated with subsequent increased point (multivariable hazard ratio HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.35) and sustained (HR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.43) abstinence among smokers. Recent quitters with ≥1 false positive screen were less likely to relapse (HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.54, 0.96). Screening result was not associated with relapse among long-term former smokers or among baseline smokers who quit during follow-up.
A false positive screen was associated with increased smoking cessation and less relapse among recent quitters. Consistently negative screens were not associated with greater relapse among long-term former smokers. Given the Affordable Care Act requires most health plans to cover smoking cessation and lung screening, the impact and cost-effectiveness of lung screening could be further enhanced with the addition of smoking cessation interventions.
肺部筛查是一个戒烟和预防复吸的契机,但不同筛查结果下的吸烟行为可能存在差异。对18840名年龄在55 - 74岁、计划接受三次年度肺部筛查的当前吸烟者和既往吸烟者的吸烟行为变化进行了评估。
在美国放射学会/国家肺部筛查试验中,参与者被随机分配接受低剂量计算机断层扫描或单视野胸部X线摄影。结果指标包括当前吸烟者的点戒烟率和持续(6个月)戒烟率以及戒烟动机;随访期间戒烟者、近期戒烟者(戒烟时间<6个月)和长期既往吸烟者(戒烟时间≥6个月)的复吸情况。
在五年的随访期间,年度点戒烟率在11.6% - 13.4%之间;48%的当前吸烟者报告曾尝试戒烟,7%的长期既往吸烟者复吸。任何假阳性筛查结果都与吸烟者随后点戒烟率(多变量风险比HR = 1.23,95%置信区间CI = 1.13,1.35)和持续戒烟率(HR = 1.28,95%置信区间CI = 1.15,1.43)的增加相关。有≥1次假阳性筛查的近期戒烟者复吸的可能性较小(HR = 0.72,95%置信区间CI = 0.54,0.96)。筛查结果与长期既往吸烟者或随访期间戒烟的基线吸烟者的复吸无关。
假阳性筛查与近期戒烟者戒烟率增加和复吸减少相关。持续阴性筛查与长期既往吸烟者更高的复吸率无关。鉴于《平价医疗法案》要求大多数健康计划涵盖戒烟和肺部筛查,通过增加戒烟干预措施,肺部筛查的影响和成本效益可能会进一步提高。