• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引导儿童进行比例推理:将离散单位作为连续量进行处理。

Prompting children to reason proportionally: Processing discrete units as continuous amounts.

作者信息

Boyer Ty W, Levine Susan C

机构信息

Georgia Southern University.

University of Chicago.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2015 May;51(5):615-20. doi: 10.1037/a0039010. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1037/a0039010
PMID:25751097
Abstract

Recent studies reveal that children can solve proportional reasoning problems presented with continuous amounts that enable intuitive strategies by around 6 years of age but have difficulties with problems presented with discrete units that tend to elicit explicit count-and-match strategies until at least 10 years of age. The current study tests whether performance on discrete unit problems might be improved by prompting intuitive reasoning with continuous-format problems. Participants were kindergarten, second-grade, and fourth-grade students (N = 194) assigned to either an experimental condition, where they were given continuous amount proportion problems before discrete unit proportion problems, or a control condition, where they were given all discrete unit problems. Results of a three-way mixed-model analysis of variance examining school grade, experimental condition, and block of trials indicated that fourth-grade students in the experimental condition outperformed those in the control condition on discrete unit problems in the second half of the experiment, but kindergarten and second-grade students did not differ by condition. This suggests that older children can be prompted to use intuitive strategies to reason proportionally.

摘要

最近的研究表明,儿童在大约6岁时就能解决以连续数量呈现的比例推理问题,这类问题可采用直观策略,但对于以离散单位呈现的问题则存在困难,这类问题往往需要引出明确的计数和匹配策略,直到至少10岁。当前的研究测试了通过连续格式问题来激发直观推理是否能提高离散单位问题的表现。参与者是幼儿园、二年级和四年级的学生(N = 194),他们被分配到两种条件之一:实验条件,即先给他们连续数量比例问题,再给离散单位比例问题;或控制条件,即只给他们所有离散单位问题。一项三因素混合模型方差分析的结果,该分析考察了年级、实验条件和试验组块,结果表明,在实验的后半部分,实验条件下的四年级学生在离散单位问题上的表现优于控制条件下的学生,但幼儿园和二年级学生在不同条件下没有差异。这表明年龄较大的儿童可以被激发使用直观策略进行比例推理。

相似文献

1
Prompting children to reason proportionally: Processing discrete units as continuous amounts.引导儿童进行比例推理:将离散单位作为连续量进行处理。
Dev Psychol. 2015 May;51(5):615-20. doi: 10.1037/a0039010. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
2
Development of proportional reasoning: where young children go wrong.比例推理的发展:幼儿易犯的错误。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1478-90. doi: 10.1037/a0013110.
3
Children's discrete proportional reasoning is related to inhibitory control and enhanced by priming continuous representations.儿童离散比例推理与抑制控制有关,并通过启动连续表示得到增强。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Nov;199:104931. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104931. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
4
Minding the gap: Children's difficulty conceptualizing spatial intervals as linear measurement units.注意差距:儿童在将空间间隔概念化为线性测量单位方面存在困难。
Dev Psychol. 2015 Nov;51(11):1564-73. doi: 10.1037/a0039707. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Exploring mathematics problems prepares children to learn from instruction.探究数学问题能让孩子更好地从教学中学习。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Dec;113(4):552-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
6
Stability and change in children's division strategies.儿童除法策略的稳定性与变化
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Mar;93(3):224-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.002. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
7
Attending to relations: Proportional reasoning in 3- to 6-year-old children.关注关系:3 至 6 岁儿童的比例推理。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Mar;54(3):428-439. doi: 10.1037/dev0000440. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
[The application of new technologies to solving maths problems for students with learning disabilities: the 'underwater school'].[新技术在帮助学习障碍学生解决数学问题中的应用:“水下学校”]
Rev Neurol. 2008;46 Suppl 1:S59-63.
9
Conceptual structure and the procedural affordances of rational numbers: relational reasoning with fractions and decimals.概念结构和有理数的程序可供性:分数和小数的关系推理。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):127-50. doi: 10.1037/xge0000034. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
10
Developing procedural flexibility: are novices prepared to learn from comparing procedures?发展程序性灵活性:新手是否准备好通过比较程序来学习?
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Sep;82(Pt 3):436-55. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02037.x. Epub 2011 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations Between Young Children's Flexible Attention to Numerical and Spatial Magnitudes and Early Math Skills.幼儿对数字和空间大小的灵活注意力与早期数学技能之间的关联。
J Cogn Dev. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2025.2480072.
2
Out of proportion or out of context? Comparing 8- to 9-year-olds' proportional reasoning abilities across fair-sharing, mixtures, and probability contexts.不成比例还是脱离情境?比较8至9岁儿童在公平分配、混合物和概率情境中的比例推理能力。
Educ Stud Math. 2023;113(3):371-388. doi: 10.1007/s10649-023-10212-5. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
3
From Non-symbolic to Symbolic Proportions and Back: A Cuisenaire Rod Proportional Reasoning Intervention Enhances Continuous Proportional Reasoning Skills.
从非符号比例到符号比例再回归:一项基于彩色棒的比例推理干预提升连续比例推理技能
Front Psychol. 2021 May 21;12:633077. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633077. eCollection 2021.
4
More than the sum of its parts: Exploring the development of ratio magnitude versus simple magnitude perception.超越部分之和:探索比率大小与简单大小感知的发展。
Dev Sci. 2021 May;24(3):e13043. doi: 10.1111/desc.13043. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
5
Taking the Relational Structure of Fractions Seriously: Relational Reasoning Predicts Fraction Knowledge in Elementary School Children.认真对待分数的关系结构:关系推理可预测小学生的分数知识。
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2020 Jul;62. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101896. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Number Representations Drive Number-Line Estimates.数字表示驱动数线估计。
Child Dev. 2020 Jul;91(4):e952-e967. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13333. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
7
Touchscreen Tablets: Coordinating Action and Perception for Mathematical Cognition.触摸屏平板电脑:协调数学认知中的行动与感知
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 8;8:144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00144. eCollection 2017.