• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

统计中介分析中的混杂:是什么以及如何解决它。

Confounding in statistical mediation analysis: What it is and how to address it.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.

出版信息

J Couns Psychol. 2017 Nov;64(6):659-671. doi: 10.1037/cou0000242.

DOI:10.1037/cou0000242
PMID:29154577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5726285/
Abstract

Psychology researchers are often interested in mechanisms underlying how randomized interventions affect outcomes such as substance use and mental health. Mediation analysis is a common statistical method for investigating psychological mechanisms that has benefited from exciting new methodological improvements over the last 2 decades. One of the most important new developments is methodology for estimating causal mediated effects using the potential outcomes framework for causal inference. Potential outcomes-based methods developed in epidemiology and statistics have important implications for understanding psychological mechanisms. We aim to provide a concise introduction to and illustration of these new methods and emphasize the importance of confounder adjustment. First, we review the traditional regression approach for estimating mediated effects. Second, we describe the potential outcomes framework. Third, we define what a confounder is and how the presence of a confounder can provide misleading evidence regarding mechanisms of interventions. Fourth, we describe experimental designs that can help rule out confounder bias. Fifth, we describe new statistical approaches to adjust for measured confounders of the mediator-outcome relation and sensitivity analyses to probe effects of unmeasured confounders on the mediated effect. All approaches are illustrated with application to a real counseling intervention dataset. Counseling psychologists interested in understanding the causal mechanisms of their interventions can benefit from incorporating the most up-to-date techniques into their mediation analyses. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

心理学研究人员通常对随机干预如何影响物质使用和心理健康等结果的潜在机制感兴趣。中介分析是一种常见的统计方法,用于研究心理机制,在过去 20 年中受益于令人兴奋的新方法改进。最新的发展之一是使用因果推断的潜在结果框架估计因果中介效应的方法。流行病学和统计学中发展起来的潜在结果方法对理解心理机制具有重要意义。我们旨在提供这些新方法的简明介绍和说明,并强调调整混杂因素的重要性。首先,我们回顾了用于估计中介效应的传统回归方法。其次,我们描述了潜在结果框架。第三,我们定义了什么是混杂因素,以及混杂因素的存在如何为干预机制提供误导性证据。第四,我们描述了有助于排除混杂因素偏差的实验设计。第五,我们描述了用于调整中介-结果关系中测量混杂因素的新统计方法和敏感性分析,以探究未测量混杂因素对中介效应的影响。所有方法都应用于真实的咨询干预数据集进行说明。有兴趣了解干预措施因果机制的咨询心理学家可以从将最新技术纳入其中介分析中受益。

相似文献

1
Confounding in statistical mediation analysis: What it is and how to address it.统计中介分析中的混杂:是什么以及如何解决它。
J Couns Psychol. 2017 Nov;64(6):659-671. doi: 10.1037/cou0000242.
2
Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis.在中介分析中增强M与Y关系因果解释的统计方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Feb;19(1):30-43. doi: 10.1177/1088868314542878. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
3
Simulation-based sensitivity analysis for causal mediation studies.基于模拟的因果中介研究敏感性分析
Psychol Methods. 2022 Dec;27(6):1000-1013. doi: 10.1037/met0000340. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
4
Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence.评估未测量混杂因素对可信可靠真实世界证据的影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1219-1227. doi: 10.1002/pds.5117. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
5
Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.通过对混杂因素-结局关系的信息先验进行调整,以消除未测量的混杂。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0634-3.
6
Sensitivity plots for confounder bias in the single mediator model.单中介模型中混杂偏倚的敏感性分析图。
Eval Rev. 2013 Oct;37(5):405-31. doi: 10.1177/0193841X14524576. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
Mediational E-values: Approximate Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Mediator-Outcome Confounding.中介效应 E 值:对未测量的中介结局混杂的近似敏感性分析。
Epidemiology. 2019 Nov;30(6):835-837. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001064.
8
Bespoke Instruments: A new tool for addressing unmeasured confounders.定制仪器:解决未测量混杂因素的新工具。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;191(5):939-947. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab288.
9
[Application of directed acyclic graphs in identifying and controlling confounding bias].有向无环图在识别和控制混杂偏倚中的应用
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 10;41(4):585-588. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20190729-00559.
10
Assessing Omitted Confounder Bias in Multilevel Mediation Models.评估多层次中介模型中遗漏混杂因素偏差
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016;51(1):86-105. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1105736.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms of Change in Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders: A Research Agenda.焦虑及相关障碍暴露疗法的改变机制:一项研究议程。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jul;13(4):687-719. doi: 10.1177/21677026241240727. Epub 2024 May 25.
2
Understanding 30-Day Mortality After First STEMI Through DAGs: Unravelling Epidemiological Cause-Effect Links.通过有向无环图理解首次ST段抬高型心肌梗死后30天死亡率:揭示流行病学因果关系
Cureus. 2025 Jun 16;17(6):e86178. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86178. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Modelling the direct and indirect associations between anthropometric and behavioural factors when predicting atherogenic risk index (TC/HDL-C) ratio.预测动脉粥样硬化风险指数(总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值)时,对人体测量学和行为因素之间的直接和间接关联进行建模。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1038/s41366-025-01835-0.
4
Suppression effect of folate on poly- and perfluoroalkyl substance-induced alterations in lipids and the atherogenic index of plasma in adolescents.叶酸对青少年体内多氟和全氟烷基物质引起的脂质变化及血浆致动脉粥样化指数的抑制作用。
Lipids Health Dis. 2025 Jun 11;24(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12944-025-02638-y.
5
A cohort study on the correlation between serum Klotho levels and all-cause mortality in American diabetic populations.一项关于美国糖尿病患者群体中血清Klotho水平与全因死亡率之间相关性的队列研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Apr 9;17(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01686-9.
6
Correlation and causation for cardiothoracic surgeons: part 4-distinguishing relationships in data.心胸外科医生的相关性与因果关系:第4部分——区分数据中的关系
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Mar;41(3):371-380. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01889-1. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
7
Practical challenges in mediation analysis: a guide for applied researchers.中介分析中的实际挑战:应用研究人员指南
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2025;25(1):57-84. doi: 10.1007/s10742-024-00327-4. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
8
Targeted Sleep Enhancement Reduces Residual Anxiety Symptoms in Peri-Adolescents Previously Treated for Anxiety Disorders.针对性睡眠改善可减轻曾接受焦虑症治疗的青少年前期患者的残留焦虑症状。
Behav Ther. 2025 Jan;56(1):133-144. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 14.
9
Classifying compounds as prebiotics - scientific perspectives and recommendations.将化合物归类为益生元——科学观点与建议。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jan;22(1):54-70. doi: 10.1038/s41575-024-00981-6. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
10
Flourishing in life in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The role of illness identity and health-related quality of life.炎症性肠病患者的生活蓬勃发展:疾病认知与健康相关生活质量的作用
J Health Psychol. 2025 Apr;30(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1177/13591053241260288. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Bias, Type I Error Rates, and Statistical Power of a Latent Mediation Model in the Presence of Violations of Invariance.在违背不变性情况下潜在中介模型的偏差、I型错误率和统计功效
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Jun;78(3):460-481. doi: 10.1177/0013164416684169. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
A Bifactor Approach to Model Multifaceted Constructs in Statistical Mediation Analysis.统计中介分析中用于对多面构念进行建模的双因素方法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018;78(1):5-31. doi: 10.1177/0013164416673689. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
3
Working alliance and empathy as mediators of brief telephone counseling for cigarette smokers who are not ready to quit.工作联盟和同理心作为尚未准备好戒烟的吸烟者简短电话咨询的调节因素。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Feb;31(1):130-135. doi: 10.1037/adb0000243.
4
The Combined Effects of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders in the Single-Mediator Model.单中介模型中测量误差和遗漏混杂因素的综合影响。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;51(5):681-697. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1224154.
5
Design approaches to experimental mediation.实验性中介的设计方法。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2016 Sep;66:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
6
Processes of change in preventing alcohol exposed pregnancy: A mediation analysis.预防酒精暴露妊娠的改变过程:一项中介分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Sep;84(9):803-812. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000111.
7
The Outcomes of an Alcohol Prevention Program on Parents' Rule Setting and Self-efficacy: a Bidirectional Model.一项关于父母规则设定和自我效能的酒精预防计划的结果:一个双向模型。
Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17(3):377-85. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0625-0.
8
Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.存在未测量混杂因素时估计直接效应和间接效应的偏差公式。
Epidemiology. 2016 Jan;27(1):125-32. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000407.
9
Causation and prediction in epidemiology: a guide to the "methodological revolution".流行病学中的因果关系与预测:“方法革命”指南
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2015 Dec;54:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
Mechanisms of symptom reduction in a combined treatment for comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and alcohol dependence.创伤后应激障碍与酒精依赖共病联合治疗中症状减轻的机制
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;83(3):655-61. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000024.