Badley Elizabeth M, Canizares Mayilee, Perruccio Anthony V, Hogg-Johnson Sheilah, Gignac Monique A M
Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.
Milbank Q. 2015 Mar;93(1):40-72. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12105.
POLICY POINTS: Despite beliefs that baby boomers are healthier than previous generations, we found no evidence that the health of baby boomers is substantially different from that of the previous or succeeding cohorts. The effects of increased education, higher income, and lower smoking rates on improving self-rated health were nearly counterbalanced by the adverse effect of increasing body mass index (BMI). Assumptions that baby boomers will require less health care as they age because of better education, more prosperity, and less propensity to smoke may not be realized because of increases in obesity.
Baby boomers are commonly believed to be healthier than the previous generation. Using self-rated health (SRH) as an indicator of health status, this study examines the effects of age, period, and birth cohort on the trajectory of health across 4 generations: World War II (born between 1935 and 1944), older baby boomers (born between 1945 and 1954), younger baby boomers (born between 1955 and 1964), and Generation X (born between 1965 and 1974).
We analyzed Canada's longitudinal National Population Health Survey 1994-2010 (n = 8,570 at baseline), using multilevel growth models to estimate the age trajectory of SRH by cohort, accounting for period and incorporating the influence of changes in education, household income, smoking status, and body mass index (BMI) on SRH over time.
SRH worsened with increasing age in all cohorts. Cohort differences in SRH were modest (p = 0.034), but there was a significant period effect (p = 0.002). We found marked cohort effects for increasing education, income, and BMI, and decreasing smoking from the youngest to the oldest cohorts, which were much reduced (education and smoking) or removed (income and BMI) once period was taken into account. At the population level, multivariable analysis showed the benefits of increasing education and income and declines in smoking on the trajectory of improving SRH were almost counterbalanced by the effects of increasing BMI (obesity).
We found no evidence to support the expectation that baby boomers will age more or less healthily than previous cohorts did. We also found that increasing BMI has likely undermined improvements in health that might have otherwise occurred, with possible implications for the need for health care. Period effects had a more profound effect than birth cohort effects. This suggests that interventions to improve health, such as reducing obesity, can be targeted to the entire, or a major portion of the, population and need not single out particular birth cohorts.
政策要点:尽管人们认为婴儿潮一代比前几代人更健康,但我们没有发现证据表明婴儿潮一代的健康状况与前一代或后一代有实质性差异。教育程度提高、收入增加和吸烟率降低对改善自评健康的影响几乎被体重指数(BMI)上升的不利影响所抵消。由于肥胖率上升,认为婴儿潮一代随着年龄增长因受教育程度更高、更富裕且吸烟倾向更低而需要的医疗保健会更少的假设可能无法实现。
人们普遍认为婴儿潮一代比上一代人更健康。本研究以自评健康(SRH)作为健康状况指标,考察了年龄、时期和出生队列对四代人健康轨迹的影响:二战一代(出生于1935年至1944年之间)、年长的婴儿潮一代(出生于1945年至1954年之间)、年轻的婴儿潮一代(出生于1955年至1964年之间)以及X一代(出生于1965年至1974年之间)。
我们分析了加拿大1994年至2010年的纵向全国人口健康调查(基线时n = 8570),使用多水平增长模型按队列估计SRH随年龄的轨迹,并考虑时期因素以及教育、家庭收入、吸烟状况和体重指数(BMI)随时间变化对SRH的影响。
所有队列中,SRH均随着年龄增长而恶化。SRH方面的队列差异较小(p = 0.034)但存在显著的时期效应(p = 0.002)。我们发现从最年轻到最年长的队列,教育程度、收入和BMI呈上升趋势,吸烟率呈下降趋势,这种队列效应显著,但在考虑时期因素后,教育程度和吸烟方面(队列效应)大幅减弱,收入和BMI方面(队列效应)则消除。在总体水平上,多变量分析表明,教育程度提高、收入增加以及吸烟率下降对改善SRH轨迹所带来的益处几乎被BMI上升(肥胖)的影响所抵消。
我们没有发现证据支持婴儿潮一代会比前几代人衰老得更健康或更不健康这一预期。我们还发现,BMI上升可能削弱了原本可能出现的健康改善,这可能对医疗保健需求产生影响。时期效应比出生队列效应的影响更为深远。这表明改善健康的干预措施,如减少肥胖,可以针对全体人口或大部分人口,而不必针对特定的出生队列。