Frank Dorothea, Reichstein Markus, Bahn Michael, Thonicke Kirsten, Frank David, Mahecha Miguel D, Smith Pete, van der Velde Marijn, Vicca Sara, Babst Flurin, Beer Christian, Buchmann Nina, Canadell Josep G, Ciais Philippe, Cramer Wolfgang, Ibrom Andreas, Miglietta Franco, Poulter Ben, Rammig Anja, Seneviratne Sonia I, Walz Ariane, Wattenbach Martin, Zavala Miguel A, Zscheischler Jakob
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Aug;21(8):2861-80. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12916. Epub 2015 May 12.
Extreme droughts, heat waves, frosts, precipitation, wind storms and other climate extremes may impact the structure, composition and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, and thus carbon cycling and its feedbacks to the climate system. Yet, the interconnected avenues through which climate extremes drive ecological and physiological processes and alter the carbon balance are poorly understood. Here, we review the literature on carbon cycle relevant responses of ecosystems to extreme climatic events. Given that impacts of climate extremes are considered disturbances, we assume the respective general disturbance-induced mechanisms and processes to also operate in an extreme context. The paucity of well-defined studies currently renders a quantitative meta-analysis impossible, but permits us to develop a deductive framework for identifying the main mechanisms (and coupling thereof) through which climate extremes may act on the carbon cycle. We find that ecosystem responses can exceed the duration of the climate impacts via lagged effects on the carbon cycle. The expected regional impacts of future climate extremes will depend on changes in the probability and severity of their occurrence, on the compound effects and timing of different climate extremes, and on the vulnerability of each land-cover type modulated by management. Although processes and sensitivities differ among biomes, based on expert opinion, we expect forests to exhibit the largest net effect of extremes due to their large carbon pools and fluxes, potentially large indirect and lagged impacts, and long recovery time to regain previous stocks. At the global scale, we presume that droughts have the strongest and most widespread effects on terrestrial carbon cycling. Comparing impacts of climate extremes identified via remote sensing vs. ground-based observational case studies reveals that many regions in the (sub-)tropics are understudied. Hence, regional investigations are needed to allow a global upscaling of the impacts of climate extremes on global carbon-climate feedbacks.
极端干旱、热浪、霜冻、降水、风暴及其他极端气候事件可能会影响陆地生态系统的结构、组成和功能,进而影响碳循环及其对气候系统的反馈。然而,极端气候驱动生态和生理过程并改变碳平衡的相互关联途径却鲜为人知。在此,我们回顾了关于生态系统对极端气候事件的碳循环相关响应的文献。鉴于极端气候的影响被视为干扰,我们假定相应的一般干扰诱导机制和过程在极端情况下也会起作用。目前明确的研究较少,无法进行定量的荟萃分析,但这使我们能够构建一个演绎框架,以确定极端气候可能作用于碳循环的主要机制(及其耦合)。我们发现,生态系统的响应可能会通过对碳循环的滞后效应超过气候影响的持续时间。未来极端气候的预期区域影响将取决于其发生概率和严重程度的变化、不同极端气候的复合效应和时间,以及受管理调节的每种土地覆盖类型的脆弱性。尽管不同生物群落的过程和敏感性存在差异,但基于专家意见,我们预计森林由于其巨大的碳库和通量、潜在的大间接和滞后影响以及恢复到先前储量的长时间,将表现出极端气候的最大净效应。在全球范围内,我们推测干旱对陆地碳循环的影响最强且最广泛。通过遥感与地面观测案例研究确定的极端气候影响的比较表明,(亚)热带的许多地区研究不足。因此,需要进行区域调查,以便将极端气候对全球碳 - 气候反馈的影响向上扩展到全球范围。