• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲击波碎石术后新发糖尿病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

New-onset diabetes mellitus after shock wave lithotripsy for urinary stone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Deng Tuo, Liao Banghua, Tian Ye, Luo Deyi, Liu Jiaming, Jin Tao, Wang Kunjie

机构信息

Department of Urology Surgery, West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2015 Jun;43(3):227-31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0761-9. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-015-0761-9
PMID:25753541
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the association between shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for urinary stone and new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM). A comprehensive data collection was performed in the Pubmed database, Embase database, Chinese Biomedical database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database and VIP database. Difference in incidence of new-onset DM after SWL between cases and controls was evaluated by odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). And summary adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated to assess the strength of association between SWL and new-onset DM, and then subgroup analyses were conducted. Five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The incidence of new-onset DM after SWL is not higher than that in the population who do not receive SWL [OR = 1.59, 95% CI (0.92, 2.74), P = 0.10]. And statistical association between SWL and new-onset DM could not be found significantly [RR = 1.33, 95% CI (0.83, 2.13), P = 0.24], either. However, body mass index (BMI) [RR = 1.09, 95% CI (1.04, 1.14), P < 0.001] and family history of DM (FHx DM) [RR = 0.35, 95% CI (0.15, 0.80), P = 0.013] were found significantly associated with the development of DM in subgroup analyses. Our data suggests that there is no association between SWL for urinary stone and new-onset DM.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估尿路结石冲击波碎石术(SWL)与新发糖尿病(DM)之间的关联。在PubMed数据库、Embase数据库、中国生物医学数据库、中国知网数据库和维普数据库中进行了全面的数据收集。通过比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)评估病例组和对照组SWL后新发DM的发病率差异。计算汇总调整风险比(RRs)和95%CI以评估SWL与新发DM之间关联的强度,然后进行亚组分析。本荟萃分析纳入了五项研究。SWL后新发DM的发病率不高于未接受SWL的人群[OR = ¹.⁵⁹,95%CI(0.92,2.74),P = 0.10]。并且也未发现SWL与新发DM之间存在显著的统计学关联[RR = 1.33,95%CI(0.83,2.13),P = 0.24]。然而,在亚组分析中发现体重指数(BMI)[RR = 1.09,95%CI(1.04,1.14),P < 0.001]和糖尿病家族史(FHx DM)[RR = 0.35,95%CI(0.15,0.80),P = 0.013]与DM的发生显著相关。我们的数据表明,尿路结石SWL与新发DM之间没有关联。

相似文献

1
New-onset diabetes mellitus after shock wave lithotripsy for urinary stone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冲击波碎石术后新发糖尿病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Urolithiasis. 2015 Jun;43(3):227-31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0761-9. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
2
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children.儿童尿路结石治疗的医学及外科干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 2;6(6):CD010784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010784.pub2.
3
Analgesia for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones - a systematic review and meta-analysis.尿路结石患者体外冲击波碎石术的镇痛——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 May-Jun;43(3):394-406. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0078.
4
The use of a virtual reality device (HypnoVR®) during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones: A case-control study.体外冲击波碎石治疗尿路结石时使用虚拟现实设备(HypnoVR®):一项病例对照研究。
Fr J Urol. 2025 Jun;35(5):102871. doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102871. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
5
What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.输尿管镜术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的利弊:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):772-786. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of new onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后新发高血压的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Apr;46(4):719-25. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0588-7. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
A Systematic Review on Comparative Analyses between Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Shock-Wave Lithotripsy for Ureter Stone According to Stone Size.根据结石大小对输尿管镜碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的比较分析的系统评价
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 16;57(12):1369. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121369.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of hypertension and diabetes after exposure to extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with renal calculi: a retrospective non-randomized data analysis.肾结石患者接受体外冲击波碎石术后高血压和糖尿病的患病率:一项回顾性非随机数据分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Jul;50(7):1227-1233. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1857-2. Epub 2018 May 21.
2
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.体外冲击波疗法:当前观点与未来方向
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Apr;18(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0672-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The high burden of inpatient diabetes mellitus: the Melbourne Public Hospitals Diabetes Inpatient Audit.住院糖尿病患者负担沉重:墨尔本公立医院糖尿病住院患者审核。
Med J Aust. 2014 Sep 15;201(6):334-8. doi: 10.5694/mja13.00104.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of new onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后新发高血压的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Apr;46(4):719-25. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0588-7. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
3
Shock wave lithotripsy and diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study.
冲击波碎石术与糖尿病:基于人群的队列研究。
Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):298-302. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1430. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
4
Twenty-year prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in patients receiving shock-wave lithotripsy for urolithiasis.接受冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石患者的糖尿病和高血压 20 年患病率。
BJU Int. 2012 Feb;109(3):444-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10291.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
5
Pretreatment with low-energy shock waves induces renal vasoconstriction during standard shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): a treatment protocol known to reduce SWL-induced renal injury.在标准冲击波碎石术(SWL)期间,低能量冲击波预处理可诱导肾血管收缩:这是一种已知可减少SWL诱导的肾损伤的治疗方案。
BJU Int. 2009 May;103(9):1270-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08277.x. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
6
Shock wave lithotripsy not associated with development of diabetes mellitus at 6 years of follow-up.冲击波碎石术在6年随访期内与糖尿病的发生无关。
Urology. 2009 Jan;73(1):4-8; discussion 8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.066. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
7
Shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones is not associated with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.肾结石的冲击波碎石术与高血压和糖尿病无关。
Urology. 2008 Apr;71(4):586-91; discussion 591-2. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.072.
8
The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术的急性和长期不良反应。
Semin Nephrol. 2008 Mar;28(2):200-13. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2008.01.003.
9
Prospective evaluation of acute endocrine pancreatic injury as collateral damage of shock-wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones.急性内分泌胰腺损伤作为上尿路结石冲击波碎石术附带损伤的前瞻性评估。
BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1339-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07127.x.
10
Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century.21世纪冲击波碎石术的优化
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):344-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.066. Epub 2007 May 2.