Barbero Colleen, Gilchrist Siobhan, Schooley Michael W, Chriqui Jamie F, Luke Douglas A, Eyler Amy A
Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Columbus Technologies and Services, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Glob Heart. 2015 Mar;10(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2014.12.013.
An essential strategy expected to reduce the global burden of chronic and cardiovascular disease is evidence-based policy. However, it is often unknown what specific components should constitute an evidence-based policy intervention. We have developed an expedient method to appraise and compare the strengths of the evidence bases suggesting that individual components of a policy intervention will contribute to the positive public health impact of that intervention. Using a new definition of "best available evidence," the Quality and Impact of Component (QuIC) Evidence Assessment analyzes dimensions of evidence quality and evidence of public health impact to categorize multiple policy component evidence bases along a continuum of "emerging," "promising impact," "promising quality," and "best." QuIC was recently applied to components from 2 policy interventions to prevent and improve the outcomes of cardiovascular disease: public-access defibrillation and community health workers. Results illustrate QuIC's utility in international policy practice and research.
一项有望减轻全球慢性疾病和心血管疾病负担的重要策略是基于证据的政策。然而,通常并不清楚基于证据的政策干预应具体包含哪些组成部分。我们开发了一种便捷的方法来评估和比较证据基础的优势,表明政策干预的各个组成部分将有助于该干预措施对公众健康产生积极影响。使用“最佳可得证据”的新定义,组成部分的质量与影响(QuIC)证据评估分析了证据质量维度以及公共卫生影响证据,以便沿着“新兴”“有前景的影响”“有前景的质量”和“最佳”的连续统一体对多个政策组成部分的证据基础进行分类。QuIC最近被应用于两项预防和改善心血管疾病结果的政策干预措施的组成部分:公众可及除颤和社区卫生工作者。结果说明了QuIC在国际政策实践和研究中的效用。