• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使行动研究专业化——现代化服务的一项有意义的策略?

Professionalizing action research--a meaningful strategy for modernizing services?

作者信息

Hall Julie E

机构信息

Head of Performance and Administration Forensic Services Directorate, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Rampton Hospital, Retford, UK.

出版信息

J Nurs Manag. 2006 Apr;14(3):195-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00584.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00584.x
PMID:16600007
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper outlines how a specific action research approach can be used to secure practice development in services which have found sustained change difficult. For the purpose of this paper discussion focuses upon using professionalizing action research (a form of action research) to secure transformation in acute inpatient mental health services. This speciality has experienced long-term difficultly in meaningful practice change. Not limited to this context parallels can be made with other health and social care services requiring significant modernization.

AIM

The aim is to critically discuss the use of professionalizing action research as an approach to sustainable change.

DISCUSSION

clarifies whether this method is a suitable vehicle for change, which is ideally suited to services which have a poor record of practice development.

METHOD

A review of action research and practice development literature forms the basis of this paper. The literature is sourced through bulletin boards, electronic databases and the British Library Classification Scheme. Keywords searched are action research, team learning, managing change and practice development. Following definition; the components of professionalizing action research are analysed using the themes of educative base, problem focus, improvement and involvement.

FINDINGS

The educative base of professionalizing action research is collaborative reflective practice which is used to initiate meaningful change, rooted in everyday practice. The benefit of this is that change actions are based in real-time situations. The problem focus component of professionalizing action research is used to emphasize the views of service users and carers. This is positive in terms of the patient and public involvement agenda although this theme does emphasize limitations of the approach. The final components are involvement and improvement, these are debated as pluralistic notions and the implications of this are acknowledged.

CONCLUSION

Reviewing the literature and theoretical application indicates the value of professionalizing action research as a process for modernization. The strength of the approach lies in the opportunity for team learning and change which is grounded in the context of services and pursued through collaboration.

摘要

背景

本文概述了如何运用一种特定的行动研究方法,来确保在那些难以实现持续变革的服务领域推动实践发展。本文讨论的重点是运用专业化行动研究(行动研究的一种形式),以实现急性住院精神卫生服务的转型。这一专业领域在有意义的实践变革方面长期面临困难。不仅限于此背景,其他需要重大现代化的卫生和社会护理服务也可与之相类比。

目的

旨在批判性地讨论将专业化行动研究作为实现可持续变革的一种方法。

讨论

阐明这种方法是否是适合变革的载体,该方法理想情况下适用于实践发展记录不佳的服务。

方法

对行动研究和实践发展文献的综述构成了本文的基础。文献来源包括公告栏、电子数据库和英国图书馆分类法。搜索的关键词为行动研究、团队学习、管理变革和实践发展。在给出定义后,运用教育基础、问题聚焦、改进和参与等主题对专业化行动研究的组成部分进行分析。

研究结果

专业化行动研究的教育基础是协作反思实践,用于启动源于日常实践的有意义变革。这样做的好处是变革行动基于实时情况。专业化行动研究的问题聚焦部分用于强调服务使用者和护理者的观点。就患者和公众参与议程而言,这是积极的,尽管该主题确实强调了该方法的局限性。最后两个组成部分是参与和改进,对其作为多元概念进行了辩论,并承认了其影响。

结论

对文献和理论应用的回顾表明,专业化行动研究作为一种现代化进程具有价值。该方法的优势在于团队学习和变革的机会,这种机会基于服务背景并通过协作来实现。

相似文献

1
Professionalizing action research--a meaningful strategy for modernizing services?使行动研究专业化——现代化服务的一项有意义的策略?
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Apr;14(3):195-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00584.x.
2
Building the capacity for evidence-based clinical nursing leadership: the role of executive co-coaching and group clinical supervision for quality patient services.培养基于证据的临床护理领导力的能力:执行联合辅导和小组临床督导对优质患者服务的作用。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Mar;15(2):230-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00750.x.
3
Admiral nursing competency project: practice development and action research.海军上将护理能力项目:实践发展与行动研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jul;14(6):695-703. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01158.x.
4
Managing practice innovations in prison health care services.管理监狱医疗服务中的实践创新。
Nurs Times. 2006;102(7):32-4.
5
Small is beautiful.小的是美好的。
Ment Health Today. 2006 Jun:30-3.
6
Engaging patients in health care: an empirical study of the role of engagement on attitudes and action.让患者参与医疗保健:一项关于参与对态度和行为作用的实证研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.055. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
7
The NHS white paper and GP consortia offer opportunities for positive change.英国国家医疗服务体系白皮书和全科医生联盟带来了积极变革的机遇。
Ment Health Today. 2010 Nov:21.
8
How grounded theory can improve nursing care quality.扎根理论如何提高护理质量。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2007 Oct-Dec;22(4):350-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000290417.27393.91.
9
Research awareness: An important factor for evidence-based practice?研究意识:循证实践的一个重要因素?
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006;3(3):103-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2006.00059.x.
10
Professionalizing action research and modernization of services.行动研究专业化与服务现代化。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Oct;15(7):767. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00682.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
2
Protocol for a feasibility evaluation of a Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) programme to improve resilience and academic achievement in refugee children from a community learning centre in Malaysia: PARSEL (Participatory Action Research on SEL).马来西亚社区学习中心改善难民儿童适应力和学业成绩的社会情绪学习(SEL)方案可行性评估方案:PARSEL(SEL 参与式行动研究)。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0273239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273239. eCollection 2022.
3
The Community Navigator Study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase community connections and reduce loneliness for people with complex anxiety or depression.社区导航员研究:一项可行性随机对照试验,旨在开展一项干预措施,以增强患有复杂焦虑症或抑郁症的人群的社区联系并减少其孤独感。
Trials. 2017 Oct 23;18(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2226-7.
4
Introducing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to a physiotherapy-led pain rehabilitation programme: an Action Research study.将接纳与承诺疗法引入以物理治疗为主导的疼痛康复计划:一项行动研究。
Br J Pain. 2016 Feb;10(1):22-8. doi: 10.1177/2049463715587117. Epub 2015 May 18.
5
Evaluating the effectiveness of care integration strategies in different healthcare systems in Latin America: the EQUITY-LA II quasi-experimental study protocol.评估拉丁美洲不同医疗体系中医疗整合策略的有效性:EQUITY-LA II 准实验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 31;5(7):e007037. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007037.
6
Participatory action research in the implementing process of evidence-based intervention to prevent childhood obesity: project design of the "Healthy Future" study.基于证据的儿童肥胖预防干预实施过程中的参与式行动研究:“健康未来”研究的项目设计
J Obes. 2013;2013:437206. doi: 10.1155/2013/437206. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials.实施研究设计:将参与式行动研究纳入随机对照试验。
Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 23;4:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-69.