• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估识别社会强化物的方法的评估。

Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.

机构信息

Western New England University and the New England Center for Children.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Spring;47(1):113-35. doi: 10.1002/jaba.107.

DOI:10.1002/jaba.107
PMID:24604393
Abstract

Although researchers have evaluated assessment methods for identifying preferred tangible and edible items for children with developmental disabilities, few have evaluated assessment methods for identifying preferred topographies of attention. In the current study, indirect and direct assessments were conducted to identify 7 topographies of attention to include in subsequent preference and reinforcer assessments. Two different assessment formats were evaluated until reliable results were achieved with 1 of them. In both formats, a therapist presented photos that depicted the topographies of attention included in the stimulus array, and a control card (resulting in no consequence) was included. After evaluation of the 2 formats, a reinforcer assessment was conducted with a socially relevant target behavior (i.e., mands) to determine the predictive validity of the preference assessments.

摘要

虽然研究人员已经评估了识别发育障碍儿童偏好的有形和可食用物品的评估方法,但很少有研究评估识别注意力偏好模式的评估方法。在本研究中,进行了间接和直接评估,以确定后续偏好和强化评估中包含的 7 种注意力偏好模式。评估了两种不同的评估格式,直到其中一种格式获得可靠的结果。在这两种格式中,治疗师呈现了描绘刺激物阵列中包含的注意力偏好模式的照片,并且包括了一张控制卡(没有后果)。在评估了这两种格式之后,进行了一个与社会相关的目标行为(即,需求)的强化评估,以确定偏好评估的预测效度。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.评估识别社会强化物的方法的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Spring;47(1):113-35. doi: 10.1002/jaba.107.
2
Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.通过识别偏好类别提高配对刺激偏好评估的效率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):221-6. doi: 10.1002/jaba.190.
3
Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.将不熟悉的刺激物纳入自闭症儿童偏好评估中。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;46(3):689-94. doi: 10.1002/jaba.56. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
4
An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.一项关于使用目光注视来测量重度身体和发育残疾个体偏好的评估。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706.
5
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
6
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.比较偏好评估:基于选择与基于持续时间的偏好评估程序
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
7
An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.对发育障碍青少年听觉刺激的刺激偏好评估
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
8
Effects of tangible and social reinforcers on skill acquisition, stereotyped behavior, and task engagement in three children with autism spectrum disorders.有形和社会强化物对 3 名自闭症谱系障碍儿童技能习得、刻板行为和任务参与的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Feb;34(2):739-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
9
Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.发育障碍个体的偏好评估程序。
Behav Modif. 2004 Sep;28(5):668-77. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259836.
10
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.

引用本文的文献

1
A Continuum of Methods for Assessing Preference for Conversation Topics.评估对话主题偏好的一系列方法
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Aug 15;17(1):306-315. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00842-9. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Advancing Methods in Animal-Assisted Intervention: Demonstration of Starting Points in Clinical Practice for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.动物辅助干预的先进方法:自闭症谱系障碍儿童临床实践起点的示范
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Apr 11;16(1):145-155. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00704-w. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Teaching Joint Attention: Assessing Generalization and Maintenance of Effects using Multiple Exemplar Training.
教授共同注意:使用多范例训练评估效果的泛化和维持
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Mar;53(3):1117-1129. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05615-x. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
4
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统(SPADS):从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
An Analysis of Feedback from a Behavior Analytic Perspective.从行为分析视角对反馈的分析
Behav Anal. 2015 Jan 14;38(1):51-75. doi: 10.1007/s40614-014-0026-x. eCollection 2015 May.