Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭伴射血分数降低和保留患者因心力衰竭恶化、心肌梗死和卒中住院后结局的比较。

Comparison of outcomes after hospitalization for worsening heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with heart failure and reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

机构信息

BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Feb;17(2):169-76. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.211. Epub 2014 Dec 30.

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the prognostic significance of hospitalization for worsening heart failure (WHF), myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke in patients with chronic heart failure (HF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 5011 patients with HF and reduced EF (HF-REF) in the CORONA trial and 4128 patients with HF and preserved EF (HF-PEF) in the I-Preserve trial. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for death were estimated for 0-30 days and ≥31 days after first post-randomization WHF, MI, or stroke used as a time-dependent variable, compared with patients with none of these events. In CORONA, 1616 patients (32%) had post-randomization first events (1223 WHF, 216 MI, 177 stroke), and the adjusted HR for mortality ≤30 days after an event was: WHF 7.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.05-25.40], MI 23.08 (95% CI 6.44-82.71), and stroke 32.15 (95% CI 8.93-115.83). The HR for mortality at >30 days was: WHF 3.62 (95% CI 3.11-4.21), MI 4.41 (95% CI 3.23-6.02), and stroke 3.19 (95% CI 2.21-4.61). In I-Preserve, 896 patients (22%) experienced a post-randomization event (638 WHF, 111 MI, 147 stroke). The HR for mortality ≤30 days was WHF 31.77 (95% CI 7.60-132.81), MI 154.77 (95% CI 34.21-700.17), and stroke 223.30 (95% CI 51.42-969.78); for >30 days it was WHF 3.36 (95% CI 2.79-4.05), MI 3.29 (95% CI 2.14-5.06), and stroke 5.13 (95% CI 3.61-7.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with both HF-REF and HF-PEF, hospitalization for WHF was associated with high early and late mortality. The early relative risk of death was not as great as following MI or stroke, but the longer term relative risk of death was similar following all three types of event. Numerically, more deaths occurred following WHF because it was a much more common event.

摘要

目的

探讨慢性心力衰竭(HF)患者住院治疗心力衰竭恶化(WHF)、心肌梗死(MI)和中风的预后意义。

方法和结果

我们研究了 CORONA 试验中 5011 例射血分数降低的 HF(HF-REF)患者和 I-Preserve 试验中 4128 例射血分数保留的 HF(HF-PEF)患者。使用首次随机分组后 WHF、MI 或中风作为时间依赖性变量,比较了 0-30 天和≥31 天内发生这些事件的患者的死亡调整风险比(HRs)。在 CORONA 中,1616 例患者(32%)发生了随机分组后的首次事件(1223 例 WHF、216 例 MI、177 例中风),事件后≤30 天的死亡率调整 HR 为:WHF 7.21(95%可信区间 [CI] 2.05-25.40),MI 23.08(95% CI 6.44-82.71),中风 32.15(95% CI 8.93-115.83)。>30 天的死亡率调整 HR 为:WHF 3.62(95% CI 3.11-4.21),MI 4.41(95% CI 3.23-6.02),中风 3.19(95% CI 2.21-4.61)。在 I-Preserve 中,896 例患者(22%)发生了随机分组后的事件(638 例 WHF、111 例 MI、147 例中风)。≤30 天的死亡率调整 HR 为 WHF 31.77(95% CI 7.60-132.81),MI 154.77(95% CI 34.21-700.17),中风 223.30(95% CI 51.42-969.78);>30 天的死亡率调整 HR 为 WHF 3.36(95% CI 2.79-4.05),MI 3.29(95% CI 2.14-5.06),中风 5.13(95% CI 3.61-7.29)。

结论

在 HF-REF 和 HF-PEF 患者中,WHF 住院与早期和晚期死亡率高有关。死亡的早期相对风险不如 MI 或中风大,但在所有三种类型的事件后,死亡的长期相对风险相似。从数值上看,WHF 导致了更多的死亡,因为它是一种更为常见的事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验