Suppr超能文献

CHARM(坎地沙坦心力衰竭评估减少死亡率和发病率)计划中心绞痛和心力衰竭患者的临床特征和结局。

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with angina and heart failure in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Programme.

机构信息

BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK; Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Feb;17(2):196-204. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.221.

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the relationship between angina pectoris and fatal and non-fatal clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HF-REF and HF-PEF, respectively).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 7599 patients in the CHARM program, 5408 had ischaemic heart disease; 3855 had HF-REF (ejection fraction ≤45%) and 1553 had HF-PEF. These patients were separated into three groups: no history of angina, previous angina, and current angina. Three coronary outcomes were examined: fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI); MI or hospitalization for unstable angina (UA); and MI, UA or coronary revascularization. The composite heart failure outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) was also analysed, along with its components and all-cause mortality. New York Heart Association functional class was worse in both HF-REF and HF-PEF patients with current angina compared with patients without angina (P < 0.001 and P = 0.005 respectively), despite similar clinical examination findings and ejection fraction. Patients with current angina had a higher risk of all three coronary outcomes (adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 1.8-3.1) than those without angina but did not have a higher risk of heart failure outcomes or all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

In patients with heart failure current angina is associated with significantly more functional limitation and a higher risk of coronary events, across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction.

摘要

目的

探讨冠心病心绞痛与射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HF-REF)和射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HF-PEF)患者的致死性和非致死性临床结局的关系。

方法和结果

CHARM 研究纳入了 7599 例患者,其中 5408 例患者有缺血性心脏病,3855 例患者为 HF-REF(射血分数≤45%),1553 例患者为 HF-PEF。这些患者被分为三组:无心绞痛病史、既往心绞痛病史和当前心绞痛病史。观察了三种冠心病结局:致死性或非致死性心肌梗死(MI);MI 或不稳定型心绞痛(UA)住院;MI、UA 或冠状动脉血运重建。还分析了心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院(HFH)的复合心力衰竭结局,及其组成部分和全因死亡率。与无心绞痛患者相比,当前有冠心病心绞痛的 HF-REF 和 HF-PEF 患者的纽约心功能分级更差(P < 0.001 和 P = 0.005),尽管临床检查结果和射血分数相似。当前有冠心病心绞痛的患者发生所有三种冠心病结局的风险更高(校正后的风险比为 1.8-3.1),但心力衰竭结局或全因死亡率风险没有增加。

结论

在心力衰竭患者中,当前的心绞痛与明显更多的功能受限和更高的冠心病事件风险相关,且横跨左心室射血分数谱。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验