Suppr超能文献

射血分数中间值心力衰竭的死亡率。

Mortality from Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction.

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil.

Hospital Barra D'or - Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022 Apr;118(4):694-700. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210050.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognostic importance of the classification 'heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (EF)' remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and in-hospital and late mortality of patients classified as having HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF - EF: 40%-49%), and to compare them to those of patients with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF - EF > 50%) and with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF - EF < 40%) on admission for decompensated HF.

METHODS

Ambispective cohort of patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit due to decompensated HF. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and in-hospital and late mortality were assessed. The software R was used, with a 5% significance, for the tests chi-square, analysis of variance, Cox multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve, in addition to machine-learning techniques (Elastic Net and survival tree).

RESULTS

519 individuals were included between September 2011 and June 2019 (mean age, 74.87 ± 13.56 years; 57.6% were men). The frequencies of HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF were 25.4%, 27% and 47.6%, respectively. Previous infarction was more frequent in HFmrEF. The mean follow-up time was 2.94 ± 2.55 years, with no statistical difference in mortality between the groups (53.8%, 52.1%, 57.9%). In the survival curve, there was difference between neither the HFpEF and HFmrEF groups, nor the HFpEF and HFrEF groups, but between the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups. Age over 77 years, previous HF, history of readmission, dementia and need for vasopressors were associated with higher late mortality in the survival tree.

CONCLUSION

The EF was not selected as a variable associated with mortality in patients with decompensated HF.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭(HF)中间射血分数(EF)分类的预后意义仍不确定。

目的

分析分类为中间射血分数心力衰竭(HFmrEF-EF:40%-49%)患者的临床特征、合并症、并发症以及住院和晚期死亡率,并与射血分数保留性心力衰竭(HFpEF-EF>50%)和射血分数降低性心力衰竭(HFrEF-EF<40%)患者进行比较,这些患者因失代偿性 HF 入院。

方法

纳入因失代偿性 HF 入住心脏重症监护病房的前瞻性队列患者。评估临床特征、合并症、并发症、住院和晚期死亡率。使用 R 软件(5%的显著性水平)进行卡方检验、方差分析、Cox 多变量分析、Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线以及机器学习技术(弹性网络和生存树)。

结果

2011 年 9 月至 2019 年 6 月期间共纳入 519 例患者(平均年龄 74.87±13.56 岁;57.6%为男性)。HFpEF、HFmrEF 和 HFrEF 的频率分别为 25.4%、27%和 47.6%。HFmrEF 中更常见既往梗死。平均随访时间为 2.94±2.55 年,各组死亡率无统计学差异(53.8%、52.1%、57.9%)。在生存曲线中,HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 组之间、HFpEF 和 HFrEF 组之间均无差异,但 HFmrEF 和 HFrEF 组之间有差异。年龄>77 岁、既往 HF、再入院史、痴呆和需要血管加压素与生存树中晚期死亡率较高相关。

结论

EF 未被选为与失代偿性 HF 患者死亡率相关的变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d8/9007002/0fe76c3c64f5/0066-782X-abc-118-04-0694-gf01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验