Pelak Mary, Pettit Amy R, Terwiesch Christian, Gutierrez Jennifer C, Marcus Steven C
Center for Evaluation of Patient Aligned Care Teams (CEPACT), Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Boston, MA, USA.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Aug;21(4):591-6. doi: 10.1111/jep.12341. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Office visits represent the core component of primary care practice, but little is known about what percentage of primary care provider (PCP) visit time could be suitable for reassignment to another medical home team member or to a non-face-to-face modality (e.g. secure messaging) in order to optimize face-to-face PCP visit time.
We videotaped 121 PCP office visits at four Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers and divided visits into discrete activity segments. Two physicians reviewed each visit recording and provided independent clinical judgments regarding which segments might be suitable for reassignment. We examined the activity category distribution of visit time rated as needing face-to-face time with a PCP.
Reviewers judged 53% of the 5398 minutes of rated visit time as suitable for reassignment to another team member or modality. The percentage of time rated as needing face-to-face PCP care varied greatly by activity category, from a high of 73.9% (for examining patients) to a low of 16.2% (for medication review). Rater agreement regarding tasks' suitability for reassignment varied across activity categories.
These data offer an example of how face-to-face PCP visit time might be optimized as practices seek to shift components of patient care to other team members and other modalities. Given variations in provider preferences and judgments, successful redesign efforts will need to involve stakeholders in decisions about how to best utilize medical home resources.
原理、目的和目标:门诊就诊是初级保健实践的核心组成部分,但对于初级保健提供者(PCP)的就诊时间中,有多大比例适合重新分配给医疗团队的其他成员或采用非面对面模式(如安全消息传递)以优化PCP面对面就诊时间,我们了解甚少。
我们在四个退伍军人健康管理局医疗中心对121次PCP门诊就诊进行了录像,并将就诊分为不同的活动环节。两名医生查看了每次就诊记录,并就哪些环节可能适合重新分配提供了独立的临床判断。我们研究了被认为需要与PCP进行面对面时间的就诊时间的活动类别分布。
评审人员判定,在5398分钟的评定就诊时间中,53%适合重新分配给其他团队成员或模式。被评定为需要PCP面对面护理的时间百分比因活动类别而异,从检查患者时的73.9%到药物审查时的16.2%不等。评审人员在任务重新分配适宜性方面的一致性因活动类别而异。
这些数据提供了一个示例,说明在医疗机构试图将患者护理的某些部分转移给其他团队成员和其他模式时,如何优化PCP面对面就诊时间。鉴于提供者偏好和判断的差异,成功的重新设计工作将需要让利益相关者参与到如何最佳利用医疗团队资源的决策中。