Suppr超能文献

全科医生面对呼吸困难和/或胸痛时的警报意识准确性:一项前瞻性观察性研究方案

The accuracy of the general practitioner's sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or thoracic pain: protocol for a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Barais Marie, Barraine Pierre, Scouarnec Florie, Mauduit Anne Sophie, Le Floc'h Bernard, Van Royen Paul, Liétard Claire, Stolper Erik

机构信息

ERCR SPURBO, Department of General Practice, Univeristé de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 10;5(3):e006810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006810.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dyspnoea and chest pain are signs shared with multiple pathologies ranging from the benign to life-threatening diseases. Gut feelings such as the sense of alarm and the sense of reassurance are known to play a substantial role in the diagnostic reasoning of general practitioners (GPs). A Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been validated to measure the GP's sense of alarm. A French version of the GFQ is available following a linguistic validation procedure. The aim of the study is to calculate the diagnostic test accuracy of a GP's sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and chest pain.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Prospective observational study. Patients aged between 18 and 80 years, consulting their GP for dyspnoea and/or thoracic pain will be considered for enrolment in the study. These GPs will have to complete the questionnaire immediately after the consultation for dyspnoea and/or thoracic pain. The follow-up and the final diagnosis will be collected 4 weeks later by phone contact with the GP or with the patient if their GP has no information. Life-threatening and non-life-threatening diseases have previously been defined according to the pathologies or symptoms in the (ICPC2) International Collegiate Programming Contest classification. Members of the research team, blinded to the actual outcomes shown on the index questionnaire, will judge each case in turn and will, by consensus, classify the expected outcomes as either life-threatening or non-life-threatening diseases. The sensitivity, the specificity, the positive and negative likelihood ratio of the sense of alarm will be calculated from the constructed contingency table.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the ethical committee of the University de Bretagne Occidentale. A written informed consent form will be signed and dated by GPs and patients at the beginning of the study. The results will be published in due course.

摘要

引言

呼吸困难和胸痛是多种疾病共有的症状,这些疾病涵盖了从良性到危及生命的各种情况。诸如警觉感和安心感等直觉在全科医生(GP)的诊断推理中起着重要作用。一种直觉问卷(GFQ)已被验证可用于测量全科医生的警觉感。经过语言验证程序后,有法语版的GFQ可供使用。本研究的目的是计算全科医生在面对呼吸困难和胸痛时的警觉感的诊断测试准确性。

方法与分析

前瞻性观察性研究。年龄在18至80岁之间、因呼吸困难和/或胸痛咨询全科医生的患者将被纳入本研究。这些全科医生必须在咨询呼吸困难和/或胸痛后立即完成问卷。4周后,通过与全科医生电话联系或在全科医生没有信息时与患者电话联系来收集随访情况和最终诊断结果。先前已根据(ICPC2)国际大学生程序设计竞赛分类中的病理或症状定义了危及生命和非危及生命的疾病。研究团队成员对索引问卷上显示的实际结果不知情,将依次判断每个病例,并通过共识将预期结果分类为危及生命或非危及生命的疾病。将根据构建的列联表计算警觉感的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得西布列塔尼大学伦理委员会的批准。在研究开始时,全科医生和患者将签署并注明日期的书面知情同意书。研究结果将在适当的时候发表。

相似文献

8

本文引用的文献

5
6
Consensus on gut feelings in general practice.全科医疗中直觉的共识。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Sep 17;10:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-66.
9
Clinical suspicion of fatal pulmonary embolism.临床怀疑为致命性肺栓塞。
Chest. 2001 Sep;120(3):791-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.3.791.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验