van der Wouden Johannes C, Blankenstein Annette H, Huibers Marcus J H, van der Windt Danielle A W M, Stalman Wim A B, Verhagen Arianne P
Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;60(8):819-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.010. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
Research in general practice has grown considerably over the past decades, but many projects face problems when recruiting patients. Lasagna's Law states that medical investigators overestimate the number of patients available for a research study. We aimed to assess factors related to success or failure of recruitment in general practice research.
Survey among investigators involved in primary care research in The Netherlands. Face-to-face interviews were held with investigators of 78 projects, assessing study design and fieldwork characteristics as well as success of patient recruitment.
Studies that focused on prevalent cases were more successful than studies that required incident cases. Studies in which the general practitioner (GP) had to be alert during consultations were less successful. When the GP or practice assistant was the first to inform the patient about the study, patient recruitment was less successful than when the patient received a letter by mail. There was a strong association among these three factors.
Lasagna's Law also holds in Dutch primary care research: many studies face recruitment problems. Awareness of study characteristics affecting participation of GPs and patients may help investigators to improve their study design.
在过去几十年中,全科医学研究有了显著增长,但许多项目在招募患者时面临问题。拉萨尼亚法则指出,医学研究人员高估了可用于研究的患者数量。我们旨在评估全科医学研究中与招募成功或失败相关的因素。
对荷兰参与初级保健研究的研究人员进行调查。对78个项目的研究人员进行了面对面访谈,评估研究设计、实地调查特征以及患者招募的成功情况。
关注现患病例的研究比需要新发病例的研究更成功。要求全科医生(GP)在会诊期间保持警惕的研究不太成功。当全科医生或诊所助理首先告知患者有关研究时,患者招募的成功率低于患者通过邮件收到信件的情况。这三个因素之间存在密切关联。
拉萨尼亚法则在荷兰初级保健研究中也成立:许多研究面临招募问题。了解影响全科医生和患者参与的研究特征可能有助于研究人员改进他们的研究设计。