Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Department of Anaesthesia, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2015 Aug;70(8):922-32. doi: 10.1111/anae.13015. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
Applying human factors principles to the design of clinical emergency guidelines is important. The UK Civil Aviation Authority uses a Checklist Assessment Tool for evaluating the content and usability of emergency drills before introduction into service on aircraft. We hypothesised that this model could be used to develop a generic medical tool. A three-stage modified Delphi process was used to adapt the above tool for use in designing medical emergency guidelines. The resulting Cognitive aids in Medicine Assessment Tool was then used to score and rank seven published difficult airway guidelines; the scores were used to assess its validity and reliability. Pearson's rank coefficient between these scores and scores from independent assessors was 0.89 (p = 0.007). Internal consistency, as assessed by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.74, 0.96 and 0.72 for the tool's three constituent domains of physical characteristics, content and layout/format, respectively. Inter-rater reliability, as assessed by Cohen's kappa, ranged from 0.33 to 0.72. The adoption of our tool has the potential to improve the usability of medical emergency guidelines.
将人为因素原则应用于临床急救指南的设计非常重要。英国民航局使用清单评估工具来评估飞机上引入服务前应急演练的内容和可用性。我们假设该模型可用于开发通用的医疗工具。采用三阶段改良 Delphi 流程来改编上述工具,以用于设计医疗急救指南。所得的医学认知辅助评估工具随后用于评分和排序七种已发布的困难气道指南;分数用于评估其有效性和可靠性。这些分数与独立评估者分数之间的 Pearson 秩相关系数为 0.89(p = 0.007)。工具的物理特性、内容和布局/格式三个组成域的内部一致性,分别用 Cronbach's alpha 评估为 0.74、0.96 和 0.72。Cohen's kappa 评估的评分者间信度范围为 0.33 至 0.72。我们的工具的采用有可能提高医疗急救指南的可用性。