• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in hand fractures and dislocations.特定患者功能量表在手部骨折和脱位中的评估
Hand (N Y). 2015 Mar;10(1):85-7. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9658-2.
2
Validity of the Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients following upper extremity nerve injury.患者特异性功能量表在上肢神经损伤患者中的效度。
Hand (N Y). 2013 Jun;8(2):132-8. doi: 10.1007/s11552-013-9506-9.
3
The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems.患者特异性功能量表:在上肢肌肉骨骼问题患者中的有效性、信度和反应度。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;42(2):56-65. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3953. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
4
The Patient-Specific Functional Scale was valid for group-level change comparisons and between-group discrimination.患者特异性功能量表对于组水平的变化比较和组间区分是有效的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):681-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.002. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
5
Minimum important differences for the patient-specific functional scale, 4 region-specific outcome measures, and the numeric pain rating scale.患者特异性功能量表、4种区域特异性结局指标和数字疼痛评分量表的最小重要差异。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Aug;44(8):560-4. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5248. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
Validity and sensitivity to change of the Patient Specific Functional Scale used during rehabilitation following proximal humeral fracture.肱骨近端骨折康复期间使用的患者特定功能量表的效度及对变化的敏感性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(5):487-92. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1044623. Epub 2015 May 11.
7
Mapping Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).将患者特定功能量表(PSFS)项目映射到国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)。
Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;92(2):310-7. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090382. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
8
The Patient Perspective on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Elective Hand Surgery: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Analysis.择期手部手术后患者报告的结局测量的患者视角:一项聚合混合方法分析。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Feb;46(2):153.e1-153.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Assessing the patient-specific functional scale's ability to detect early recovery following total knee arthroplasty.评估患者特异性功能量表在全膝关节置换术后早期恢复中的检测能力。
Phys Ther. 2014 Jun;94(6):838-44. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130399. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
10
Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients treated surgically for carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.瑞典版患者特定功能量表在接受手术治疗腕掌关节骨关节炎患者中的有效性和可靠性。
J Hand Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;26(1):53-60; quiz 61. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
TEMPORARY REMOVAL: What Do Patients Want? Outcome Measures in a Diverse World.临时移除:患者想要什么?多元世界中的结果指标。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Jun 20;7(5):100766. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100766. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures assessing recovery from hand fractures: a systematic review.评估手部骨折康复的患者报告结局测量工具的心理测量学特性:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Dec;33(12):3213-3221. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03768-z. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
3
RECITAL: a non-inferiority randomised control trial evaluating a virtual fracture clinic compared with in-person care for people with simple fractures (study protocol).叙述:一项非劣效性随机对照试验,评估虚拟骨折诊所与面对面护理对单纯骨折患者的效果(研究方案)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 5;14(2):e080800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080800.
4
A proposed paradigm shift in the management of distal radius fractures.桡骨远端骨折治疗中一种提议的范式转变。
J Orthop. 2023 Nov 29;49:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.065. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
The Patient Perspective on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Elective Hand Surgery: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Analysis.择期手部手术后患者报告的结局测量的患者视角:一项聚合混合方法分析。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Feb;46(2):153.e1-153.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
6
Validity and reliability of telephone administration of the patient-specific functional scale for the assessment of recovery from snakebite envenomation.电话管理的患者特异性功能量表评估蛇伤康复的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Dec 13;13(12):e0007935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007935. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Prevalence of cold sensitivity in patients with hand pathology.手部疾病患者中冷敏感的患病率。
Hand (N Y). 2015 Jun;10(2):173-6. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9694-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of the Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients following upper extremity nerve injury.患者特异性功能量表在上肢神经损伤患者中的效度。
Hand (N Y). 2013 Jun;8(2):132-8. doi: 10.1007/s11552-013-9506-9.
2
Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery.哪种结局指标是最佳的?评估手部和腕部手术后上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷、密歇根手部问卷以及患者特定功能量表的反应性。
Hand (N Y). 2009 Sep;4(3):311-8. doi: 10.1007/s11552-009-9167-x. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
3
The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validity in workers' compensation claimants.患者特定功能量表:在工伤赔偿 claimants 中的有效性。 (注:这里“claimants”直译为“索赔人”,结合语境可能是指工伤赔偿的申请人等相关人员,具体准确意思需结合更多背景信息确定)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jul;89(7):1294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.040. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
4
The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy.神经根型颈椎病患者颈部功能障碍指数和患者特定功能量表的信度及结构效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 1;31(5):598-602. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201241.90914.22.
5
Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain.腰痛患者疼痛、功能障碍及身体损伤结局的反应性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15;29(8):879-83. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00011.
6
Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release.腕管松解术后,上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷、腕管综合征问卷以及SF-36对临床变化的比较反应性。
J Hand Surg Am. 2003 Mar;28(2):250-4. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2003.50043.
7
Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36.通过与SF-36量表的相关性评估上肢功能障碍和伤残问卷(DASH)的结构效度。
J Hand Surg Am. 2002 May;27(3):537-41. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.32964.
8
Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity.测量整体还是部分?上肢不同区域的手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍结局测量指标的效度、信度和反应度
J Hand Ther. 2001 Apr-Jun;14(2):128-46.
9
Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.密歇根手部结果问卷的信度和效度测试。
J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jul;23(4):575-87. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7.
10
The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction.患者特异性功能量表:在颈部功能障碍患者中应用的效度验证
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 May;27(5):331-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.5.331.

特定患者功能量表在手部骨折和脱位中的评估

Evaluation of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in hand fractures and dislocations.

作者信息

Novak Christine B, Williams Marianne M, Conaty Kathleen

机构信息

Toronto Western Hospital Hand Program, Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada ; Toronto Western Hospital Hand Program, 399 Bathurst Street, 2EW-422, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8 Canada.

Toronto Western Hospital Hand Program, Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2015 Mar;10(1):85-7. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9658-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11552-014-9658-2
PMID:25762885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4349835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Generic upper extremity disability questionnaires utilize standardized items. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) allows the patient to identify specific self-reported items. This study evaluated the validity of the PSFS to assess outcome in patients with hand fractures or dislocations.

METHODS

Adults with hand fractures or dislocations, who completed hand therapy between January 2012 and January 2013, were eligible for inclusion. At the initial and final assessment, each patient was asked to complete the PSFS. Each patient identified three items that were difficult or they were unable to perform, and the degree of difficulty was ranked from 0 to 10 (able to perform at pre-injury level). We excluded patients with an incomplete PSFS. Statistical analyses evaluated the relationships between the PSFS and the independent variables.

RESULTS

There were 63 patients (37 men, 26 women); 21 of the 63 patients underwent surgery for fracture fixation. The mean duration of hand therapy treatment was 2.2 ± 1.4 months. The mean PSFS scores were as follows: initial 3.2 ± 2.2; final 8.1 ± 2.2. There was a significant improvement in PSFS scores from initial to final assessment (p < 0.001) and a moderate correlation (r = 0.3, p = 0.02). There was no statistical difference in PSFS scores between men and women or surgery and no surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In these patients with hand fractures or dislocations, the PSFS indicated significant improvement in function. Using items identified by the patient, the PSFS provides a valuable perspective of outcome and may be used in conjunction with generic disease-specific questionnaire for assessment of the upper extremity.

摘要

背景

通用的上肢残疾问卷使用标准化项目。患者特定功能量表(PSFS)允许患者确定特定的自我报告项目。本研究评估了PSFS评估手部骨折或脱位患者治疗结果的有效性。

方法

纳入2012年1月至2013年1月间完成手部治疗的手部骨折或脱位的成人患者。在初始和最终评估时,要求每位患者完成PSFS。每位患者确定三项难以完成或无法完成的项目,并将困难程度从0到10进行排名(能够达到受伤前水平)。我们排除了PSFS不完整的患者。统计分析评估了PSFS与自变量之间的关系。

结果

共有63例患者(37例男性,26例女性);63例患者中有21例行骨折固定手术。手部治疗的平均时长为2.2±1.4个月。PSFS的平均得分如下:初始3.2±2.2;最终8.1±2.2。从初始评估到最终评估,PSFS得分有显著改善(p<0.001),且存在中度相关性(r = 0.3,p = 0.02)。男性与女性之间或手术组与非手术组之间的PSFS得分无统计学差异。

结论

在这些手部骨折或脱位的患者中,PSFS表明功能有显著改善。通过使用患者确定的项目,PSFS提供了有价值的结果视角,可与通用的疾病特异性问卷结合使用以评估上肢情况。