• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

密歇根手部结果问卷的信度和效度测试。

Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

作者信息

Chung K C, Pillsbury M S, Walters M R, Hayward R A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0340, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jul;23(4):575-87. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7.

DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7
PMID:9708370
Abstract

In this study, psychometric principles were used to develop an outcomes questionnaire capable of measuring health state domains important to patients with hand disorders. These domains were hypothesized to include (1) overall hand function, (2) activities of daily living (ADL), (3) pain, (4) work performance, (5) aesthetics, and (6) patient satisfaction with hand function. An initial pool of 100 questions was pilot-tested for clarity in 20 patients; following factor analysis, the number of questions was reduced to a 37-item Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). The MHQ, along with the Short Form-12, a generic health status outcomes questionnaire, was then administered to 200 consecutive patients at a university-based hand surgery clinic and was subjected to reliability and validity testing. The mean time required to complete the questionnaire was 10 minutes (range, 7-20 minutes). Factor analysis supported the 6 hypothesized scales. Test-retest reliability using Spearman's correlation demonstrated substantial agreement, ranging from 0.81 for the aesthetics scale to 0.97 for the ADL scale. In testing for internal consistency, Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.86 for the pain scale to 0.97 for the ADL scale (values >0.7 for Cronbach's alpha are considered a good internal consistency). Correlation between scales gave evidence of construct validity. In comparing similar scales in the MHQ and the Short Form-12, a moderate correlation (range, 0.54-0.79) for the ADL, work performance, and pain scales was found. In evaluating the discriminate validity of the aesthetics scale, a significant difference (p = .0012) was found between the aesthetics scores for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The MHQ is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring hand outcomes. It can be used in a clinic setting with minimal burden to patients. The questions in the MHQ have undergone rigorous psychometric testing, and the MHQ is a promising instrument for evaluation of outcomes following hand surgery.

摘要

在本研究中,运用心理测量学原理开发了一份结果调查问卷,该问卷能够测量对手部疾病患者而言重要的健康状态领域。这些领域被假设包括:(1)手部整体功能,(2)日常生活活动(ADL),(3)疼痛,(4)工作表现,(5)美观程度,以及(6)患者对手部功能的满意度。最初有100个问题的题库在20名患者中进行了清晰度的预测试;经过因子分析后,问题数量减少至一份包含37个条目的密歇根手部结果调查问卷(MHQ)。随后,MHQ与一份通用健康状况结果调查问卷简明健康状况调查简表-12一起,被发放给一家大学附属手部外科诊所的200名连续就诊患者,并进行了信度和效度测试。完成问卷所需的平均时间为10分钟(范围为7 - 20分钟)。因子分析支持了6个假设的量表。使用斯皮尔曼相关性进行的重测信度显示出高度一致性,美观程度量表为0.81,ADL量表为0.97。在内部一致性测试中,克朗巴哈系数范围从疼痛量表的0.86到ADL量表的0.97(克朗巴哈系数>0.7被认为具有良好的内部一致性)。量表之间的相关性证明了结构效度。在比较MHQ和简明健康状况调查简表-12中的相似量表时,发现ADL、工作表现和疼痛量表存在中等程度的相关性(范围为0.54 - 0.79)。在评估美观程度量表的区分效度时,发现腕管综合征患者和类风湿性关节炎患者的美观程度得分存在显著差异(p = 0.0

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.密歇根手部结果问卷的信度和效度测试。
J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jul;23(4):575-87. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7.
2
Comparing the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.比较类风湿性关节炎患者的AUSCAN骨关节炎手部指数、密歇根手部结果问卷和连续职业灵巧性评估。
J Rheumatol. 2004 Oct;31(10):1996-2001.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Michigan hand questionnaire.《密歇根手问卷》韩文版的跨文化适应与验证
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Sep;36(9):1497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
4
Validity and reliability of the instrument Performance and Satisfaction in Activities of Daily Living (PS-ADL) and its clinical applicability to adults with rheumatoid arthritis.日常生活活动表现与满意度量表(PS-ADL)的有效性、可靠性及其在类风湿性关节炎成人患者中的临床适用性。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2008 Mar;15(1):13-22. doi: 10.1080/11038120701223165.
5
Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery.密歇根手部结果问卷和手臂、肩部及手部残疾问卷在腕管手术中的反应性
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jan;30(1):81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.10.006.
6
Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE-Hong Kong Version).患者自评腕关节评估问卷中文版(香港版)的结构效度。
J Hand Ther. 2006 Jan-Mar;19(1):18-26, quiz 27. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.10.003.
7
Effective hand function assessment after burn injuries.烧伤后有效的手部功能评估。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2004 Jan-Feb;25(1):134-9; discussion 128. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000105050.53263.30.
8
The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change.密歇根手部结果问卷(MHQ):对临床变化反应性的评估
Ann Plast Surg. 1999 Jun;42(6):619-22. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199906000-00006.
9
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.
10
Comparative responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release.腕管松解术后密歇根手部结果问卷与腕管问卷的比较反应性
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Feb;34(2):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.10.021.

引用本文的文献

1
[Surgical and Injection Interventions for Dupuytren's Disease: A Systematic Review Protocol].[掌腱膜挛缩症的手术及注射干预:一项系统评价方案]
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2025 Sep 8;60(3):s00451811596. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1811596. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Surgical and Injection Interventions for Dupuytren's Disease: A Systematic Review Protocol.掌腱膜挛缩症的手术和注射干预:一项系统评价方案
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2025 Sep 8;60(3):s00451811595. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1811595. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Delayed autografting in the face and hands: The role of allografts in burn wound bed preparation.
面部和手部自体皮延迟移植:同种异体皮在烧伤创面准备中的作用。
JPRAS Open. 2025 May 20;45:480-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.05.006. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
A hand biomechanics dataset of kinematics, kinetics, electromyography, and imaging in healthy adults.健康成年人手部运动学、动力学、肌电图和影像学的生物力学数据集。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 25:2025.08.21.671503. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.21.671503.
5
Long-term follow-up of modified shunt-restricted instep arterialized venous flap for reconstruction of hand defects.改良限流足背动脉化静脉皮瓣修复手部缺损的长期随访
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1662159. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1662159. eCollection 2025.
6
Mechanism of action behind the pain-relief effects of extracellular vesicles in microfragmented adipose tissue: an in vitro and in vivo study.微片段化脂肪组织中细胞外囊泡止痛作用的作用机制:一项体外和体内研究
J Transl Med. 2025 Aug 18;23(1):931. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06930-4.
7
Midterm Outcomes of Four-Corner Fusion Surgery Using Nitinol Staples.使用镍钛合金吻合钉进行四角融合手术的中期结果
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Aug 7;7(5):100805. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100805. eCollection 2025 Sep.
8
A Polish Version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ-PL) for Use Among Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Undergoing Physiotherapy: Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation.用于接受物理治疗的腕管综合征患者的波兰语版波士顿腕管问卷(BCTQ-PL):翻译、文化调适与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 29;13(11):1288. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111288.
9
Assessing Correlations Between Radiographic Classification and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Symptomatic Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis.评估有症状的拇指腕掌关节骨关节炎的影像学分类与患者报告的结局指标之间的相关性。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Mar 27;7(3):100702. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.01.011. eCollection 2025 May.
10
A protocol for randomized controlled trial on early active flexion versus passive flexion mobilization therapy for Spaghetti wrist injuries.一项关于意大利面条腕损伤早期主动屈曲与被动屈曲活动疗法的随机对照试验方案。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 24;20(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05884-z.