Suppr超能文献

提高上肢运动员的球速:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Increasing Ball Velocity in the Overhead Athlete: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Myers Natalie L, Sciascia Aaron D, Westgate Philip M, Kibler William B, Uhl Tim L

机构信息

1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; 2Shoulder Center of Kentucky, Lexington Clinic Orthopedics-Sports Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky; and 3Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Oct;29(10):2964-79. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000931.

Abstract

Overhead athletes routinely search for ways to improve sport performance, and one component of performance is ball velocity. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of different strengthening interventions on ball and serve velocity. A comprehensive literature search with pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1970 to 2014 was conducted. Eligible studies were randomized control trials including the mean and SDs of both pretest and posttest ball velocities in both the experimental and the control groups. The outcome of interest was ball/serve velocity in baseball, tennis, or softball athletes. Level 2 evidence or higher was investigated to determine the effect different training interventions had on velocity. Pretest and posttest data were extracted to calculate Hedges's g effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Methodological qualities of the final 13 articles within the analysis were assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. The majority of the articles included in this analysis had an effect on velocity with the strongest effect sizes found in periodized training (Hedges's g = 3.445; 95% CI = 1.976-4.914). Six studies had CI that crossed zero, indicating that those specific interventions should be interpreted with caution. Consistent and high-quality evidence exists that specific resistance training interventions have an effect on velocity. These findings suggest that interventions consisting of isokinetic training, multimodal training, and periodization training are clinically beneficial at increasing velocity in the overhead athlete over different windows of time.

摘要

从事过头运动的运动员经常寻求提高运动表现的方法,而表现的一个要素就是球速。本荟萃分析的目的是研究不同强化干预措施对球速和发球速度的影响。我们进行了一项全面的文献检索,检索范围为1970年至2014年,并设定了预先确定的纳入和排除标准。符合条件的研究为随机对照试验,包括实验组和对照组的测试前和测试后球速的均值和标准差。感兴趣的结果是棒球、网球或垒球运动员的球速/发球速度。我们研究了二级或更高水平的证据,以确定不同训练干预措施对速度的影响。提取测试前和测试后的数据,以计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的赫奇斯g效应量。使用物理治疗证据数据库量表评估分析中最后13篇文章的方法学质量。本分析中纳入的大多数文章对速度有影响,其中在周期性训练中发现了最强的效应量(赫奇斯g = 3.445;95% CI = 1.976 - 4.914)。六项研究的置信区间跨过了零,这表明对这些特定干预措施的解释应谨慎。有一致且高质量的证据表明,特定的阻力训练干预措施对速度有影响。这些发现表明,在不同时间段内,由等速训练、多模式训练和周期性训练组成的干预措施在提高过头运动运动员的速度方面具有临床益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验