• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消防员绝对摄氧量与体重相关摄氧量对比:不同年龄组在穿着和不穿着防护服及自给式呼吸器情况下的体能评估

Absolute vs. weight-related maximum oxygen uptake in firefighters: fitness evaluation with and without protective clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus among age group.

作者信息

Perroni Fabrizio, Guidetti Laura, Cignitti Lamberto, Baldari Carlo

机构信息

School of Exercise and Sport Sciences (SUISM), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 12;10(3):e0119757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119757. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0119757
PMID:25764201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4357474/
Abstract

During fire emergencies, firefighters wear personal protective devices (PC) and a self-contained breathing apparatus (S.C.B.A.) to be protected from injuries. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of aerobic level in 197 firefighters (age: 34±7 yr; BMI: 24.4±2.3 kg.m-2), evaluated by a Queen's College Step field Test (QCST), performed with and without fire protective garments, and to analyze the differences among age groups (<25 yr; 26-30 yr, 31-35 yr, 36-40 yr and >40 yr). Variance analysis was applied to assess differences (p < 0.05) between tests and age groups observed in absolute and weight-related values, while a correlation was examined between QCST with and without PC+S.C.B.A. The results have shown that a 13% of firefighters failed to complete the test with PC+S.C.B.A. and significant differences between QCST performed with and without PC+S.C.B.A. in absolute (F(1,169) = 42.6, p < 0.0001) and weight-related (F(1,169) = 339.9, p < 0.0001) terms. A better correlation has been found in L•min-1 (r=0.67) than in ml•kg-1•min-1 (r=0.54). Moreover, we found significant differences among age groups both in absolute and weight-related values. The assessment of maximum oxygen uptake of firefighters in absolute term can be a useful tool to evaluate the firefighters' cardiovascular strain.

摘要

在火灾紧急情况下,消防员穿戴个人防护装备(PC)和自给式呼吸器(S.C.B.A.)以保护自己免受伤害。本研究的目的是调查197名消防员(年龄:34±7岁;体重指数:24.4±2.3kg·m⁻²)在穿着和不穿着防火服的情况下,通过女王学院阶梯试验(QCST)评估的有氧水平差异,并分析不同年龄组(<25岁;26 - 30岁、31 - 35岁、36 - 40岁和>40岁)之间的差异。采用方差分析来评估在绝对和与体重相关的值中观察到的测试与年龄组之间的差异(p<0.05),同时检查了穿着和不穿着PC + S.C.B.A.时的QCST之间的相关性。结果表明,13%的消防员未能穿着PC + S.C.B.A.完成测试,并且在绝对(F(1,169)=42.6,p<0.0001)和与体重相关(F(1,169)=339.9,p<0.0001)方面,穿着和不穿着PC + S.C.B.A.进行的QCST之间存在显著差异。在L·min⁻¹(r = 0.67)中发现的相关性比在ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹(r = 0.54)中更好。此外,我们发现不同年龄组在绝对和与体重相关的值方面均存在显著差异。以绝对值评估消防员的最大摄氧量可以成为评估消防员心血管负荷的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Absolute vs. weight-related maximum oxygen uptake in firefighters: fitness evaluation with and without protective clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus among age group.消防员绝对摄氧量与体重相关摄氧量对比:不同年龄组在穿着和不穿着防护服及自给式呼吸器情况下的体能评估
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 12;10(3):e0119757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119757. eCollection 2015.
2
Effects of the self-contained breathing apparatus and fire protective clothing on maximal oxygen uptake.自给式呼吸器和防火服对最大摄氧量的影响。
Ergonomics. 2006 Aug 15;49(10):911-20. doi: 10.1080/00140130600667451.
3
Physical fitness profile of professional Italian firefighters: differences among age groups.专业意大利消防员的体能特征:不同年龄组之间的差异。
Appl Ergon. 2014 May;45(3):456-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
4
Firefighter protective clothing and self contained breathing apparatus does not alter balance testing using a standard sensory organization test or motor control test in healthy, rested individuals.消防员防护服和自给式呼吸器不会改变健康、休息良好的个体使用标准感觉组织测试或运动控制测试时的平衡测试结果。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Oct;80:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Effects of firefighters' self-contained breathing apparatus' weight and its harness design on the physiological and subjective responses.消防员自给式呼吸器的重量及其背带设计对生理和主观反应的影响。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(7):782-91. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.663506. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
6
Component contribution of personal protective equipment to the alleviation of physiological strain in firefighters during work and recovery.个人防护装备对消防员工作和恢复期间生理应激缓解的组成部分贡献。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(7):1068-77. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.907449. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
7
A biomechanical evaluation of firefighters' musculoskeletal loads when carrying self-contained breathing apparatus in walking and running.消防员在行走和跑步时佩戴自给式呼吸器的肌肉骨骼负荷的生物力学评估。
J Safety Res. 2023 Dec;87:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
8
A fractionation of the physiological burden of the personal protective equipment worn by firefighters.消防员个人防护装备所带来的生理负担的分担。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Aug;112(8):2913-21. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2267-7. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
9
Physiological responses and parasympathetic reactivation in rescue interventions: The effect of the breathing apparatus.救援干预中的生理反应和副交感神经再激活:呼吸设备的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Dec;28(12):2710-2722. doi: 10.1111/sms.13291. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
10
The effect of firefighter protective garments, self-contained breathing apparatus and exertion in the heat on postural sway.消防员防护服、自给式呼吸器以及在高温环境下运动对姿势摇摆的影响。
Ergonomics. 2017 Aug;60(8):1137-1145. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1257162. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on optimal strategy of different fire rescue tasks based on oxygen consumption.基于氧气消耗的不同火灾救援任务最优策略研究
Front Physiol. 2025 Mar 24;16:1548031. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1548031. eCollection 2025.
2
Using a Walking Test to Assess Firefighter Fitness.使用步行测试评估消防员的体能
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Feb 1;17(4):285-297. doi: 10.70252/LXNT2864. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of the relationship between occupational-specific task performance and measures of physical fitness, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health in firefighters.评估消防员特定职业任务表现与身体适应性、心血管和肌肉骨骼健康测量指标之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17487-6.
4
Are there sex differences in physiological parameters and reaction time responses to overload in firefighters?消防员在生理参数和反应时间对超负荷的反应中是否存在性别差异?
PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0249559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249559. eCollection 2021.
5
Changes in Health and Physical Fitness Parameters After Six Months of Group Exercise Training in Firefighters.消防员进行六个月团体运动训练后健康与体能参数的变化
Sports (Basel). 2020 Oct 28;8(11):143. doi: 10.3390/sports8110143.
6
Cardiorespiratory Fitness as a Correlate of Cardiovascular, Anthropometric, and Physical Risk Factors: Using the Ruffier Test as a Template.心肺适能作为心血管、人体测量和身体风险因素的相关指标:以 Ruffier 测试为模板。
Can Respir J. 2020 Sep 8;2020:3407345. doi: 10.1155/2020/3407345. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical fitness profile of professional Italian firefighters: differences among age groups.专业意大利消防员的体能特征:不同年龄组之间的差异。
Appl Ergon. 2014 May;45(3):456-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
2
Field tests for evaluating the aerobic work capacity of firefighters.评估消防员有氧工作能力的现场测试。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 2;8(7):e68047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068047. Print 2013.
3
Performance on a work-simulating firefighter test versus approved laboratory tests for firefighters and applicants.在工作模拟消防员测试中的表现与消防员和申请人的经批准的实验室测试相比。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19(2):227-43. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2013.11076981.
4
Lifestyle factors predicting changes in aerobic capacity of aging firefighters at 3- and 13-year follow-ups.生活方式因素预测老年消防员有氧能力在 3 年和 13 年随访中的变化。
J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Sep;54(9):1133-41. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182554b11.
5
Comparison of aerobic capacity in annually certified and uncertified volunteer firefighters.年度认证与未认证志愿消防员有氧能力比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 May;27(5):1435-40. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318265aaf7.
6
Effects of firefighters' self-contained breathing apparatus' weight and its harness design on the physiological and subjective responses.消防员自给式呼吸器的重量及其背带设计对生理和主观反应的影响。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(7):782-91. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.663506. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
7
Physical and thermal strain of firefighters according to the firefighting tactics used to suppress wildfires.根据扑灭野火所采用的消防战术,消防员的体力和热力消耗。
Ergonomics. 2011 Nov;54(11):1101-8. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.611895.
8
Effects of load carriage and fatigue on gait characteristics.负荷携带和疲劳对步态特征的影响。
J Biomech. 2011 Apr 29;44(7):1259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
9
Energy cost and energy sources during a simulated firefighting activity.模拟消防活动中的能量消耗和能量来源。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Dec;24(12):3457-63. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b2c7ff.
10
The thermal ergonomics of firefighting reviewed.消防热工效学综述。
Appl Ergon. 2010 Jan;41(1):161-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Aug 6.