• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用定制合成网片臂进行双侧骶棘韧带穹窿固定术:一年的临床结果

Bilateral sacrospinous vault fixation with tailored synthetic mesh arms: clinical outcomes at one year.

作者信息

Geoffrion Roxana, Hyakutake Momoe T, Koenig Nicole A, Lee Terry, Cundiff Geoffrey W

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Feb;37(2):129-137. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30334-0.

DOI:10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30334-0
PMID:25767945
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bilateral sacrospinous fixation with tailored mesh arms (bSSVF) uses polypropylene mesh to suspend the vault to the sacrospinous ligaments bilaterally with minimal tension, recreating nulliparous midline anatomy. It can be used with uterine conservation. Our primary objective was to determine objective cure rate at one year following bSSVF compared with a control group undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC). Secondary objectives were to compare symptoms, quality of life, sexual function, pain, and global satisfaction before and after surgery and between bSSVF and ASC groups at one year.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with symptomatic prolapse who chose to undergo bSSVF or ASC. Baseline demographics were obtained. Prolapse quantification, validated symptom questionnaire scores, and McGill pain scores were obtained at baseline, six weeks, and one-year postoperatively. Global satisfaction was recorded. The primary outcome measure was the difference in cure rate (vault stage ≤ 1) between groups.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were recruited: 30 underwent bSSVF and 17 ASC. Forty-three patients were available for one-year follow-up. Baseline data were similar. There was no difference in vault stage between bSSVF and ASC groups at one year. Five women who underwent bSSVF had cervical elongation, and four of these were classified as POP recurrence. Women who underwent bSSVF had more anterior recurrences but fewer postoperative complications, shorter hospital stay, and less use of narcotics than controls. Questionnaire scores were similar at one year. All respondents felt subjective improvement after either surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective and subjective cure rates are comparable after bSSVF and ASC. Hysteropexy may cause cervical elongation that merits further research.

摘要

目的

采用定制网片臂的双侧骶棘肌固定术(bSSVF)使用聚丙烯网片将穹隆双侧悬吊于骶棘韧带上,张力最小,重建未生育女性的中线解剖结构。该手术可用于保留子宫的情况。我们的主要目的是确定bSSVF术后一年与接受腹骶阴道固定术(ASC)的对照组相比的客观治愈率。次要目的是比较手术前后以及bSSVF组和ASC组术后一年的症状、生活质量、性功能、疼痛和总体满意度。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了有症状脱垂且选择接受bSSVF或ASC的患者。获取了基线人口统计学数据。在基线、术后六周和一年时进行脱垂量化、经过验证的症状问卷评分和麦吉尔疼痛评分。记录总体满意度。主要结局指标是两组之间治愈率(穹隆分期≤1)的差异。

结果

招募了50名患者:30例行bSSVF,17例行ASC。43名患者可进行一年的随访。基线数据相似。bSSVF组和ASC组术后一年穹隆分期无差异。5例行bSSVF的女性出现宫颈延长,其中4例被归类为盆腔器官脱垂复发。与对照组相比,行bSSVF的女性前位复发更多,但术后并发症更少、住院时间更短且使用麻醉剂更少。一年时问卷评分相似。所有受访者在任何一种手术后都感觉主观上有改善。

结论

bSSVF和ASC术后的客观和主观治愈率相当。子宫固定术可能导致宫颈延长,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Bilateral sacrospinous vault fixation with tailored synthetic mesh arms: clinical outcomes at one year.使用定制合成网片臂进行双侧骶棘韧带穹窿固定术:一年的临床结果
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Feb;37(2):129-137. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30334-0.
2
Does bilateral sacrospinous fixation with synthetic mesh recreate nulliparous pelvic anatomy? An MRI evaluation.使用合成网片进行双侧骶棘韧带固定能否重塑未生育女性的骨盆解剖结构?一项MRI评估。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):222-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000066.
3
Bilateral minimal tension sacrospinous fixation in pelvic organ prolapse: an observational study.双侧最小张力骶棘肌固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项观察性研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 May;188:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
4
Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.经阴道前壁网片联合骶棘韧带固定术或阴道后壁网片修补术治疗子宫阴道或阴道穹窿脱垂。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Aug;157(2):230-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.031. Epub 2011 May 10.
5
Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.阴道和腹腔镜网状子宫固定术治疗子宫阴道脱垂:一项平行队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):38.e1-38.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
6
Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial.肛提肌撕裂患者子宫切除术后阴道穹窿脱垂治疗中阴道网片修补术与骶棘韧带阴道固定术的比较:一项随机对照试验
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;43(4):365-71. doi: 10.1002/uog.13305. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
7
[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].[三种手术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的比较结果及生殖器脱垂复发危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100.
8
Utero-vaginal suspension using bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh: intermediate results of a cohort study.采用双侧阴道前路骶棘肌固定联合网片的子宫阴道悬吊术:一项队列研究的中期结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1803-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2748-z. Epub 2015 May 31.
9
Outcome of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation of the Vault during Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂修复术中阴道穹窿骶棘韧带固定术的疗效
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018 Oct 30;16(3):321-324.
10
Vaginal axis after abdominal sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation-a randomized trial.腹式骶骨阴道固定术与阴道骶棘韧带固定术治疗阴道轴的比较:一项随机试验。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Apr;38(4):1142-1151. doi: 10.1002/nau.23970. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
COMET (Composite Outcomes of Mesh vs suture Techniques for prolapse repair)- Protocol for a single blind randomized controlled multicenter trial testing surgical innovation in female pelvic surgery.COMET(网片与缝合技术治疗脱垂修复的综合结局)- 一项在女性盆腔手术中测试手术创新的单盲随机对照多中心试验方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0308926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308926. eCollection 2024.
2
A novel technique for the measurement of cervical length in non-pregnant women.一种用于测量非妊娠女性宫颈长度的新技术。
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2024 May 22;27(3):141-148. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12383. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Long-Term Outcomes (10 Years) of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.
骶棘韧带固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂修复的长期结局(10年)
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 13;12(16):1611. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161611.
4
Vaginal Hysterectomy Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse with Cervical Elongation: A Case Report.经阴道子宫切除术治疗伴有宫颈延长的盆腔器官脱垂:一例报告
Oman Med J. 2024 Mar 31;39(2):e616. doi: 10.5001/omj.2024.14. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Clinical Effect of Uterosacral and Cardinal Ligament Fixation versus Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.经阴道子宫穹窿脱垂行骶骨固定与主骶韧带固定的临床效果比较:一项回顾性分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2023 Jun 3;2023:1489928. doi: 10.1155/2023/1489928. eCollection 2023.
6
Bilateral Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Vaginal Hysterectomy for Apical Uterovaginal Prolapse.双侧骶棘韧带子宫悬吊术与双侧骶棘韧带固定术联合经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫阴道顶端脱垂的比较
Int Neurourol J. 2022 Sep;26(3):239-247. doi: 10.5213/inj.2244076.038. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
7
Cervical Elongation - The Search for a Definition.宫颈延长——定义的探寻
Maedica (Bucur). 2022 Jun;17(2):487-491. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.487.
8
Clinical Risk Factors for Uterine Cervical Elongation among Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂女性子宫颈延长的临床危险因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179255.
9
Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.关于治疗盆腔器官脱垂手术术语的联合报告
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Mar;31(3):429-463. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04236-1.
10
Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.保留子宫手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项系统评价及Meta分析与临床实践指南
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):505-522. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03876-2. Epub 2019 Feb 11.