Adelmanesh Farhad, Jalali Ali, Jazayeri Shooshtari Seyed Mostafa, Raissi Gholam Reza, Ketabchi Seyed Mehdi, Shir Yoram
From the The Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (FA, YS); Ear, Nose, Throat, Head and Neck Surgery Department and Research Center, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (AJ); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran (SMJS); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (GRR); and International Neuroscience Institute, Hannover, Germany (SMK).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Oct;94(10):784-91. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000261.
The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of gluteal trigger point in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy with that in healthy volunteers.
In a cross-sectional, multistage sampling method, patients with clinical, electromyographic, and magnetic resonance imaging findings consistent with lumbosacral radiculopathy were examined for the presence of gluteal trigger point. Age- and sex-matched clusters of healthy volunteers were selected as the control group. The primary outcome of the study was the presence or absence of gluteal trigger point in the gluteal region of the patients and the control group.
Of 441 screened patients, 271 met all the inclusion criteria for lumbosacral radiculopathy and were included in the study. Gluteal trigger point was identified in 207 (76.4%) of the 271 patients with radiculopathy, compared with 3 (1.9%) of 152 healthy volunteers (P < 0.001). The location of gluteal trigger point matched the side of painful radiculopathy in 74.6% of patients with a unilateral radicular pain. There was a significant correlation between the side of the gluteal trigger point and the side of patients' radicular pain (P < 0.001).
Although rare in the healthy volunteers, most of the patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy had gluteal trigger point, located at the painful side. Further studies are required to test the hypothesis that specific gluteal trigger point therapy could be beneficial in these patients.
本研究的目的是比较腰骶神经根病患者与健康志愿者中臀肌触发点的患病率。
采用横断面、多阶段抽样方法,对临床、肌电图和磁共振成像结果符合腰骶神经根病的患者进行臀肌触发点检查。选择年龄和性别匹配的健康志愿者群体作为对照组。本研究的主要结果是患者和对照组臀肌区域是否存在臀肌触发点。
在441名筛查患者中,271名符合腰骶神经根病的所有纳入标准并被纳入研究。271例神经根病患者中有207例(76.4%)发现臀肌触发点,而152名健康志愿者中有3例(1.9%)发现臀肌触发点(P<0.001)。在单侧神经根性疼痛患者中,74.6%的患者臀肌触发点的位置与疼痛的神经根侧相匹配。臀肌触发点的一侧与患者神经根性疼痛的一侧之间存在显著相关性(P<0.001)。
虽然在健康志愿者中很少见,但大多数腰骶神经根病患者有臀肌触发点,位于疼痛侧。需要进一步研究来验证特定的臀肌触发点治疗对这些患者有益的假设。