Holm-Jensen Aske, Kjaer Per, Schiøttz-Christensen Berit, Ziegler Dorthe Schøler, Andersen Stina, Myburgh Corrie
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 Jan 30;2(2):100044. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100044. eCollection 2020 Jun.
To determine the interexaminer reproducibility for judging the presence, number, and location of leg-pain referring myofascial trigger points, and their prevalence in patients with low back pain with and without concomitant leg pain referral.
An interexaminer reproducibility study.
An outpatient public Hospital Spine Centre in Southern Denmark.
: experienced examiners (N=2), a chiropractor and a physiotherapist, respectively. : a case mix of patients with low back pain (N=32) with and without leg pain referral.
A standardized palpation examination protocol of 4 bilateral lumbosacral muscles performed by each examiner.
Reproducibility on presence (measured in Cohen's κ), number (difference and limits of agreement), location (distance between matching marks placed by examiners), and prevalence of myofascial trigger points.
Kappa values of the examined muscles were as follows: quadratus lumborum (κ=0.42), gluteus medius (κ=0.83), gluteus minimus (κ=0.74), and piriformis (κ=0.62), with a mean of all examined muscles of kappa=0.66, assessed as substantial agreement. The mean difference in number of trigger points was 0.8, with limits of agreement ranging from -6.4 to 4.9. Mean distance between trigger point locations was 12.9 mm, with 57% only being identified by a single examiner. The prevalence of trigger points was 82.7%, highest in the gluteal region of the painful side.
Inadequate standardization and multiple trigger point sites complicate interexaminer reproducibility on location and number of patients with low back pain and leg pain referral. Nevertheless, substantial interexaminer reproducibility for the trigger point presence appears achievable. Implemented routinely, this relatively simple clinical evaluation procedure could meaningfully enhance diagnostic triage and eventual management.
确定检查者之间在判断腿痛相关肌筋膜触发点的存在、数量和位置方面的可重复性,以及在伴有和不伴有腿痛的腰痛患者中的患病率。
检查者间可重复性研究。
丹麦南部一家公立门诊医院脊柱中心。
分别为一名脊椎按摩师和一名物理治疗师两名经验丰富的检查者;一组腰痛患者(N = 32),包括伴有和不伴有腿痛的患者。
每位检查者对4对双侧腰骶部肌肉进行标准化触诊检查方案。
触发点存在情况的可重复性(用Cohen's κ系数衡量)、数量(差异和一致性界限)、位置(检查者放置的匹配标记之间的距离)以及肌筋膜触发点的患病率。
所检查肌肉的kappa值如下:腰方肌(κ = 0.42)、臀中肌(κ = 0.83)、臀小肌(κ = 0.74)和梨状肌(κ = 0.62),所有检查肌肉的平均kappa值为0.66,评定为高度一致。触发点数量的平均差异为0.8,一致性界限范围为 -6.4至4.9。触发点位置之间的平均距离为12.9毫米,57%的触发点仅由一名检查者识别。触发点的患病率为82.7%,在疼痛侧的臀部区域最高。
标准化不足和多个触发点部位使检查者之间在伴有腿痛的腰痛患者的触发点位置和数量方面的可重复性变得复杂。然而,触发点存在情况的高度检查者间可重复性似乎是可以实现的。常规实施这种相对简单的临床评估程序可以显著加强诊断分类和最终管理。