Gathright Molly M, Thrush Carol, Guise J Benjamin, Krain Lewis, Clardy James
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;40(2):287-94. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0303-3. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
In order to better understand the professional development of medical students during their psychiatry clerkship, this study identifies common themes and characteristics of students' critical incident narratives which are designed to capture a recount of clerkship experiences they perceived as meaningful.
A total of 205 narratives submitted by psychiatry clerkship students in 2010-2011 were subjected to a thematic analysis using a methodological approach and adaptation of categories derived from prior similar research. Descriptive content analysis was also carried out to assess the valence of the narrative content, characters involved, and whether there was evidence that the experience changed students' perspectives in some way.
Narratives contained a variety of positive (19%) and negative content (24%) and many contained a hybrid of both (57%). The most common theme (29%) concerned issues of respect and disrespect in patient, clinical, and coworker interactions. In general, the majority (68%) of students' meaningful experience narratives reflected a change in their perspective (e.g., I learned that...). Narratives containing positive and hybrid content were associated with a change in students' perspective (χ(2) = 10.61, df = 2, p < 0.005).
Medical students are keenly aware of the learning environment. Positive and hybrid critical incident narratives were associated with a stated change in their beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors due to the experience. Understanding the events that are meaningful to students can also provide rich feedback to medical educators regarding the ways in which students perceive clinical learning environments and how to best foster their professional development.
为了更好地理解医学生在精神科实习期间的专业发展,本研究确定了学生关键事件叙述的共同主题和特征,这些叙述旨在记录他们认为有意义的实习经历。
对2010 - 2011年精神科实习学生提交的205篇叙述采用一种方法进行主题分析,并对先前类似研究得出的类别进行调整。还进行了描述性内容分析,以评估叙述内容的效价、涉及的人物,以及是否有证据表明该经历在某种程度上改变了学生的观点。
叙述包含各种积极内容(19%)和消极内容(24%),许多叙述同时包含两者(57%)。最常见的主题(29%)涉及患者、临床和同事互动中的尊重与不尊重问题。总体而言,大多数(68%)学生有意义的经历叙述反映了他们观点的变化(例如,我了解到……)。包含积极和混合内容的叙述与学生观点的变化相关(χ(2) = 10.61,自由度 = 2,p < 0.005)。
医学生敏锐地意识到学习环境。积极和混合的关键事件叙述与因该经历而导致的信念、态度或行为的明确变化相关。了解对学生有意义的事件也可以为医学教育工作者提供丰富的反馈,涉及学生如何看待临床学习环境以及如何最好地促进他们的专业发展。