Barden L, Lipson A, Pert P, Walker-Smith J A
Academic Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Medical College of St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1989 Dec;3(6):597-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1989.tb00253.x.
A study was undertaken in paediatric patients suffering from ulcerative, Crohn's or indeterminate colitis. This aimed to compare the occurrence and tolerance of side-effects arising during treatment with position-release mesalazine (Asacol) with those occurring during previous treatment with sulphasalazine (Salazopyrin). The drugs were used to maintain remission from colitis. The occurrence of adverse reactions was also monitored. Sixty-seven children were assessed for a period of 6 months; 45 of these children received mesalazine after previous treatment with sulphasalazine. The results show that the majority of patients were maintained in remission with either drug, but they reported a preference for position-release mesalazine with respect to ease and frequency of administration when compared to sulphasalazine. No serious adverse reactions arose during mesalazine treatment, compared with three such events during previous sulphasalazine treatment.
一项针对患有溃疡性结肠炎、克罗恩病或不确定性结肠炎的儿科患者开展了研究。其目的是比较控释美沙拉嗪(艾迪莎)治疗期间出现的副作用的发生率和耐受性与先前使用柳氮磺胺吡啶(水杨酸偶氮磺胺吡啶)治疗期间出现的副作用的发生率和耐受性。这些药物用于维持结肠炎的缓解状态。同时也监测不良反应的发生情况。对67名儿童进行了为期6个月的评估;其中45名儿童在先前接受柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗后改用美沙拉嗪。结果显示,大多数患者使用这两种药物中的任何一种都能维持缓解状态,但与柳氮磺胺吡啶相比,他们表示在给药便利性和给药频率方面更倾向于控释美沙拉嗪。美沙拉嗪治疗期间未出现严重不良反应,而先前柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗期间出现了3起此类事件。