Hampton Justin, Strand Paul S
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA,
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Aug;45(8):2519-30. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2419-4.
The present study utilized meta-analytic procedures to estimate the diagnostic validity of instruments used to screen young children, ages 1.5-5 years, for autism. Five scales met inclusion criteria, and data from 18 studies contributed the meta-analysis. Results revealed that 4 of 5 scales met criteria for "good" validity, including two broad band scales (instruments not restricted to screening for autism). The current results suggest that validity differences might be a function of how instruments sample across the DSM content domains. Specifically, high validity instruments included a higher proportion of items assessing social interaction skills. The availability of valid broad- and narrow-band instruments, as well as implications for constructing future screening instruments, is discussed.
本研究采用荟萃分析程序来估计用于筛查1.5至5岁幼儿自闭症的工具的诊断效度。有五个量表符合纳入标准,来自18项研究的数据纳入了荟萃分析。结果显示,五个量表中有四个符合“良好”效度标准,其中包括两个宽带量表(不限于自闭症筛查的工具)。目前的结果表明,效度差异可能取决于工具在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》内容领域中的抽样方式。具体而言,高效度工具中评估社交互动技能的项目比例更高。文中讨论了有效宽带和窄带工具的可用性以及对构建未来筛查工具的启示。