• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

元分析未被承认的强奸的流行率。

Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Unacknowledged Rape.

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, VA, USA

Psychology Department, University of Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, VA, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Apr;17(2):149-59. doi: 10.1177/1524838015576391. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1177/1524838015576391
PMID:25784571
Abstract

Many sexual violence survivors do not label their experiences as rape but instead use more benign labels, such as "bad sex" or "miscommunication." A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the mean prevalence of unacknowledged rape and to inform our understanding of methodological factors that influence the detection of this phenomenon. Studies were identified using PsycINFO, PubMED, and PILOTS and were required to report the percentage of unacknowledged rape that had occurred since the age of 14 among female survivors. Moderator variables included mean participant age, recruitment source, rape definition, and unacknowledged rape definition. Twenty-eight studies (30 independent samples) containing 5,917 female rape survivors met the inclusion criteria. Based on a random effects model, the overall weighted mean percentage of unacknowledged rape was 60.4% (95% confidence interval [55.0%, 65.6%]). There was a large amount of heterogeneity, Q(29) = 445.11, p < .001, and inconsistency (I(2) = 93.5%) among included studies. The prevalence was significantly higher among college student participants compared to noncollege participants. The findings supported that over half of all female rape survivors do not acknowledge that they have been raped. The results suggest that screening tools should use behaviorally descriptive items about sexual contact, rather than using terms such as "rape."

摘要

许多性暴力幸存者并不将自己的经历描述为强奸,而是使用更温和的标签,例如“糟糕的性经历”或“沟通失误”。本研究进行了荟萃分析,以估计未被承认的强奸的平均发生率,并深入了解影响检测这种现象的方法学因素。研究使用 PsycINFO、PubMED 和 PILOTS 进行了检索,要求报告在 14 岁以后,女性幸存者中未被承认的强奸发生率。调节变量包括平均参与者年龄、招募来源、强奸定义和未被承认的强奸定义。28 项研究(30 个独立样本)包含 5917 名女性强奸幸存者,符合纳入标准。基于随机效应模型,未被承认的强奸的总体加权平均百分比为 60.4%(95%置信区间[55.0%,65.6%])。纳入研究之间存在大量异质性(Q(29)=445.11,p<.001)和不一致性(I(2)=93.5%)。与非大学生参与者相比,大学生参与者的发生率明显更高。研究结果支持这样一个观点,即超过一半的女性强奸幸存者不承认自己被强奸了。这些结果表明,筛选工具应该使用性行为描述性项目来描述性接触,而不是使用“强奸”等术语。

相似文献

1
Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Unacknowledged Rape.元分析未被承认的强奸的流行率。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Apr;17(2):149-59. doi: 10.1177/1524838015576391. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
2
Beyond the campus: unacknowledged rape among low-income women.校园之外:低收入女性中未被承认的强奸案
Violence Against Women. 2008 Mar;14(3):269-86. doi: 10.1177/1077801207313733.
3
Unacknowledged Rape: The Influences of Child Sexual Abuse and Personality Traits.未被承认的强奸:儿童性虐待和人格特质的影响
J Child Sex Abus. 2015;24(8):975-90. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2015.1082002.
4
Rape acknowledgment and postassault experiences: how acknowledgment status relates to disclosure, coping, worldview, and reactions received from others.强奸确认与性侵后经历:确认状态与披露、应对、世界观以及他人反应之间的关系。
Violence Vict. 2006 Dec;21(6):761-78.
5
Unacknowledged and missed cases of sexual victimization: A comparison of responses to broad versus behaviorally specific questions.未被承认和遗漏的性受害案例:对广泛问题与行为具体问题的反应比较。
Aggress Behav. 2022 Nov;48(6):573-582. doi: 10.1002/ab.22043. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
6
Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: situational factors and posttraumatic stress.未被承认与被承认的强奸受害者:情境因素与创伤后应激
J Abnorm Psychol. 1996 Feb;105(1):124-31. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.105.1.124.
7
Unacknowledged Rape in the Community: Rape Characteristics and Adjustment.社区中未被承认的强奸:强奸特征与适应情况
Violence Vict. 2018 Feb 1;33(1):142-156. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00104.
8
Conceptualizing the "wantedness" of women's consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: implications for how women label their experiences with rape.对女性自愿和非自愿性经历的“意愿性”进行概念化:对女性如何给她们的强奸经历贴上标签的影响。
J Sex Res. 2007 Feb;44(1):72-88. doi: 10.1080/00224490709336794.
9
Rape myth acceptance and rape acknowledgment: The mediating role of sexual refusal assertiveness.强奸谬论认同和强奸认知:性拒绝自信的中介作用。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 May;263:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
10
Is sexual victimization gender specific?: the prevalence of forced sexual activity among men and women in denmark, and self-reported well-being among survivors.性侵害存在性别差异吗?:丹麦男性和女性中强迫性活动的发生率以及幸存者自我报告的幸福感。
J Interpers Violence. 2008 Oct;23(10):1414-40. doi: 10.1177/0886260508314305. Epub 2008 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonconsensual Sexual Experience Acknowledgment: Exploring the Roles of Gender Identity, Sexual Aggression Myths, and Psychological Inflexibility.非自愿性经历确认:探索性别认同、性侵犯神话和心理僵化的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;15(7):875. doi: 10.3390/bs15070875.
2
Sexual Assault Labeling Over Time Among Gender and Sexual Identity Groups: How and Why Survivors' Perceptions Changed.不同性别和性取向群体在不同时期对性侵犯的认定:幸存者认知的变化方式及原因
Sex Roles. 2025 Apr;91(4). doi: 10.1007/s11199-025-01576-4. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
3
A Prospective Examination of Sexual Assault Labeling and Posttraumatic Stress: Does Trust in the Perpetrator Make a Difference?
性侵犯标签与创伤后应激的前瞻性研究:对加害者的信任会产生影响吗?
J Trauma Dissociation. 2025 May-Jun;26(3):392-414. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2025.2481476. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
4
Online and Offline Disclosures of Unwanted Sexual Experiences: A Comparison of Reactions and Affect.非自愿性性经历的线上与线下披露:反应与情感的比较
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;15(2):102. doi: 10.3390/bs15020102.
5
How do people with a history of sexual abuse experience talking therapies for sexual trauma? A systematic review of qualitative findings.有性虐待史的人如何体验针对性创伤的谈话疗法?对定性研究结果的系统综述。
Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jun;98(2):211-231. doi: 10.1111/papt.12571. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
6
Sexual Violence and Shame: A Meta-Analysis.性暴力与羞耻感:一项元分析
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2025 Jan 17:15248380241308828. doi: 10.1177/15248380241308828.
7
A comprehensive epidemiological assessment of female rape in São Paulo State, Brazil: trends, patterns, and implications for public health.巴西圣保罗州女性强奸案的综合流行病学评估:趋势、模式及其对公共卫生的影响。
Int J Legal Med. 2025 Mar;139(2):763-777. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03354-5. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
8
Beyond Force, Incapacitation, or Verbal Coercion: Rates and Outcomes of Sexual Assault without Warning.超越暴力、 incapacitation 或言语胁迫:无预警性侵犯的发生率及后果 。 (注:这里“incapacitation”在医学或法律语境中有“使无行为能力”等意思,结合语境可能是指通过药物等手段使受害者失去反抗能力等情况,可根据具体领域进一步准确理解和表述。)
J Sex Res. 2024 Sep 19:1-10. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2403019.
9
Survivors' Experiences of Sexual Assault by Intimate Partners: A Qualitative Study of Survivors and their Informal Supports.亲密伴侣性侵犯幸存者的经历:对幸存者及其非正式支持的定性研究
J Fam Violence. 2024 Jul;39(5):875-887. doi: 10.1007/s10896-023-00535-5. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
10
Why do rape victimization rates vary across studies? A meta-analysis examining moderating variables.为何不同研究中的强奸受害率会有所不同?一项考察调节变量的元分析。
Aggress Violent Behav. 2023 Jul-Aug;71. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2023.101839. Epub 2023 Apr 6.