Pluess Michael, Bartley Mel
Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Apr;69(4):330-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204263.
The social gradient in smoking is well known, with higher rates among those in less advantaged socioeconomic position. Some recent research has reported that personality characteristics partly explain this gradient. However, the majority of existing work is limited by cross-sectional designs unsuitable to determine whether differences in conscientiousness are a predictor or a product of social inequalities. Adopting a life course perspective, we investigated in the current paper the influence of conscientiousness in early and mid-life on the social gradient in smoking and the role of potential confounding factors in a large longitudinal cohort study.
Using data from the 1958 National Child Development Study, we examined the extent to which two measures of conscientiousness, one assessed with a personality questionnaire at age 50 and one derived from three related items at 16 years in childhood, explained the social gradient of smoking at age 50 by comparing nested logistic regression models that included social class at birth, cognitive ability, attention and conduct problems at age 7, and educational qualification.
Childhood conscientiousness was a significant predictor of smoking at 50 years (OR=0.86, CI (95%) 0.84 to 0.88), explaining 5.0% of the social gradient independent of all other variables. Childhood conscientiousness was a stronger predictor than adult conscientiousness, statistically accounting for the observed direct association of adult conscientiousness with smoking.
Conscientiousness may be a predictor rather than a product of social differences in smoking. Inclusion of personality measures and adoption of a life course perspective add significantly to our understanding of health inequalities.
吸烟的社会梯度现象众所周知,社会经济地位较低者的吸烟率更高。近期一些研究报告称,人格特征在一定程度上解释了这一梯度现象。然而,现有大多数研究受限于横断面设计,无法确定尽责性差异是社会不平等的预测因素还是其产物。本文采用生命历程视角,在一项大型纵向队列研究中,调查了早年和中年时期的尽责性对吸烟社会梯度的影响以及潜在混杂因素的作用。
利用1958年全国儿童发展研究的数据,我们通过比较嵌套逻辑回归模型(包括出生时的社会阶层、认知能力、7岁时的注意力和行为问题以及教育程度),研究了两种尽责性测量方法(一种在50岁时通过人格问卷评估,另一种源自童年16岁时的三个相关项目)对50岁时吸烟社会梯度的解释程度。
童年时期的尽责性是50岁时吸烟的显著预测因素(比值比=0.86,95%置信区间0.84至0.88),独立于所有其他变量解释了5.0%的社会梯度。童年时期的尽责性比成年时期的尽责性是更强的预测因素,从统计学上解释了观察到的成年尽责性与吸烟之间的直接关联。
尽责性可能是吸烟社会差异的预测因素而非产物。纳入人格测量和采用生命历程视角显著增进了我们对健康不平等的理解。