Laboratory of Personality and Development, Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38(3):237-48. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9142-3. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
Little is known about whether educational gradients in smoking patterns can be explained by financial measures of socioeconomic status (SES) and/or personality traits.
To assess whether the relationship of education to (1) never smoking and (2) having quit smoking would be confounded by financial measures of SES or by personality; whether lower Neuroticism and higher Conscientiousness would be associated with having abstained from or quit smoking; and whether education effects were modified by personality.
Using data from the Midlife Development in the US National Survey, 2,429 individuals were classified as current (n = 695), former (n = 999), or never (n = 735) smokers. Multinomial logistic regressions examined study questions.
Greater education was strongly associated with both never and former smoking, with no confounding by financial status and personality. Never smoking was associated with lower Openness and higher Conscientiousness, while have quit was associated with higher Neuroticism. Education interacted additively with Conscientiousness to increase and with Openness to decrease the probability of never smoking.
Education and personality should be considered unconfounded smoking risks in epidemiologic and clinical studies. Educational associations with smoking may vary by personality dispositions, and prevention and intervention programs should consider both sets of factors.
对于吸烟模式的教育梯度是否可以用社会经济地位(SES)的财务指标和/或人格特征来解释,人们知之甚少。
评估教育与(1)从不吸烟和(2)已经戒烟之间的关系是否会因 SES 的财务指标或人格特征而产生混淆;低神经质和高尽责性是否与不吸烟或戒烟有关;以及人格是否会改变教育效果。
利用美国全国中年发展调查的中期生活发展数据,对 2429 名个体进行分类,分为当前吸烟者(n=695)、前吸烟者(n=999)和从不吸烟者(n=735)。使用多项逻辑回归检验研究问题。
更高的教育程度与从不吸烟和以前吸烟都有很强的关联,而财务状况和人格没有混淆。从不吸烟与较低的开放性和较高的尽责性有关,而戒烟与较高的神经质有关。教育与尽责性呈相加性相互作用,增加了从不吸烟的可能性,而与开放性呈负相关,降低了从不吸烟的可能性。
在流行病学和临床研究中,应将教育和人格视为独立的吸烟风险因素。教育与吸烟的关联可能因人格特征而异,预防和干预计划应同时考虑这两个因素。